Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Terrorism & Security

London riots push British leaders to approve harsher police tactics [VIDEO]

The British public is asking why it took so long for the government to authorize the use of weapons like rubber bullets against rioters. But it is unclear how effective they will be in quelling the riots.

By Staff writer / August 10, 2011

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron (r.) meets with senior officers from the police, fire and ambulance services during a meeting at Wolverhampton Civic Center in central England August 10. The British government has now authorized the use of water cannons and plastic and rubber bullets in quelling the London riots.

Paul Ellis/Reuters


• A daily summary of global reports on security issues.

Skip to next paragraph

Recent posts

The fact that it took British police days to quell rioting and looting in London's streets – and that it continues elsewhere – has many British asking why the police are so reluctant to turn to more aggressive tactics.

While police brought much of London under control overnight Tuesday, residents wondered what took them so long, the Monitor reported today.

“It’s good to see so many police on the streets, but where were they last night when everything was going off?" lawyer Samantha Jones, who lives in [Clapham Junction, in South London]. "People were definitely fearful last night about what happened and frightened. This area is normally really buzzy this time of night, but not tonight. I don’t know whether they’re still scared or intimidated by all the police but people seem to just want to go home … like me.”

The British government has now authorized the use of water cannons and plastic and rubber bullets in quelling the riots (the latter of which has have never been officially used by police on the British mainland), but the permission comes several days after riots and looting turned parts of London into a smoldering husk – too late, according to many London residents.

Normal crowd control methods failed, Telegraph opinion editor Daniel Knowles writes, but no one seems to know what to do next.

One of the first questions that the Government has to answer is how do the police deal with riots like these? It seems quite clear that policing has, to some extent, failed. Overwhelmed by the numbers and speed of looters, officers seem to have given up on protecting property. Minimising violence is a good aim, but I think near enough every law abiding citizen is sickened at watching these children – and they do mostly seem to be teenagers – pillaging property like neanderthals.

According to Telegraph editorial writer Robert Colvile, the riots are shifting public opinion toward a more hardline approach to criminal justice.

Forget Ken Clarke and rehabilitation – the public are in hanging mood (to the extent that 33 per cent of those polled by YouGov want to see the police breaking out live ammunition). The papers, too, are baying for blood. The very lack of political motivation behind the riots, and the naked greed on display, means that sympathy is in very short supply.

As of midday Wednesday, more than 3,100 people had "liked" the Facebook page "London Riots – Bring in the rubber bullets."

IN PICTURES: Britain riots

In a separate article, The Telegraph reports that the latest polls indicate that 65 percent of the public supports the use of rubber bullets and 90 percent believe water cannons should be used. Seventy-seven percent said they would like to see the army deployed in the streets and 82 percent want night curfews. Extreme measures – the use of tasers and tear gas – were supported by more than 70 percent of those polled.


Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story