Pakistan displays competing interests as it answers questions on bin Laden raid
Although it gave a heated defense of its commitment to fighting terrorism, Pakistan is now more focused on convincing the Pakistani public that it can stand up to the US.
Pakistani police officer secure a street close to the house, seen in background, where it is where Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden lived in Abbottabad, Pakistan on Tuesday, May 3. Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari denied suggestions his country's security forces may have sheltered Osama bin Laden before he was killed by American forces, and said their cooperation with the United States helped pinpoint the world's most wanted man.
Anjum Naveed/AP
• A daily summary of global reports on security issues.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
05.29.12
After massacre in Syria, Annan travels to Damascus to push peace plan -
05.25.12
UN chief: There is no 'plan B' for ending the Syrian conflict -
05.24.12
Pakistan to US: Respect our decision to sentence CIA informant -
05.23.12
US drone strike in Pakistan highlights divergent interests of US, Pakistan -
05.22.12
Yemen vows to defy Al Qaeda's intimidation campaign
The Pakistani government, facing harsh questioning from its own citizens and US officials after Osama bin Laden's death, is struggling to satisfy two groups with competing interests.
The US wants assurances that it has a trustworthy partner in the fight against terrorism, while the Pakistani public wants to know that its government will protect their sovereignty. The line that the Pakistani government must walk was evident this week as details unfolded into the raid that killed Mr. bin Laden at his secret compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Initially, Pakistan defended its military and intelligence agency against accusations that they were aware of bin Laden’s whereabouts.
In a Washington Post Op-Ed, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari said, "Some in the US press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism, or worse yet that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing. Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn’t reflect fact."
Mr. Zardari expressed "satisfaction that our early assistance in identifying an Al Qaeda courier ultimately led to this day."
Indeed, some Pakistani security officials had first described it as a "joint operation."
By midweek, however, Pakistani officials had changed their tone, going from defensive to combative in an apparent bid to quell rising frustration at home just as a Monitor reporter found "pulsing" anti-Americanism in Abbottabad over the US operation.
“This is a shameful incident for us. Our army should have shot down the US choppers,” an Abbottabad resident told Agence France-Presse. The fact that the US operation ended with the capture of bin Laden did not seem to change their minds.











These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.