New US plan sees Palestinian state in 2012 but Israel wary
The latest US proposal for peace between Israel and Palestinians envisions a Palestinian state in two years, according to Egyptian officials. US Middle East envoy George Mitchell is expected to visit in the coming weeks.
(Page 2 of 2)
President Obama trumpeted US re-engagement with the Israeli-Palestinian peace process shortly after taking office just under a year ago. But his diplomats' efforts bore little fruit in 2009.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
05.29.12
After massacre in Syria, Annan travels to Damascus to push peace plan -
05.25.12
UN chief: There is no 'plan B' for ending the Syrian conflict -
05.24.12
Pakistan to US: Respect our decision to sentence CIA informant -
05.23.12
US drone strike in Pakistan highlights divergent interests of US, Pakistan -
05.22.12
Yemen vows to defy Al Qaeda's intimidation campaign
One sticking point is Israeli settlements. Israel has agreed to a partial freeze of new settlement building. But the Palestinian Authority has said it wants a full freeze, including a stop to construction in disputed East Jerusalem, before it will return to the negotiating table.
(See map of the region, with Israeli settlements marked, here.)
Obama's administration drew criticism for first calling for a halt to all settlement activity, but then appearing to back off that demand by praising Israel's partial freeze. In late October, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Israel's "restraint" on settlements "unprecedented," wording that caused dismay in Arab capitals, MSNBC reported, and led Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to threaten to quit.
In an interview in the December 2009 issue of Foreign Policy, former US President Bill Clinton said he thought there was "some chance" that the Israelis and Palestinians might be ready for a deal, because "the long-term trend lines are bad for both sides."
Right now, Hamas is kind of discredited after the Gaza operation, and yet [the Palestinian Authority] is clearly increasing [its] capacity. They are in good shape right now, but if they are not able to deliver sustained economic and political advances, that's not good for them.
The long-term trends for the Israelis are even more stark, because they will soon enough not be a majority. Then they will have to decide at that point whether they will continue to be a democracy and no longer be a Jewish state, or continue to be a Jewish state and no longer be a democracy. That's the great spur.
--
See also:
Pakistan volleyball game attack: Will local opposition to Taliban hold firm?
The Christian Science Monitor
US imposes extra security checks on air passengers from 14 countries
The Guardian
Jordan emerges as key CIA counterterrorism ally
The Washington Post



Previous







These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.