Growing Taliban clout threatens Pakistani government
The group controls large areas in the Swat Valley and runs a parallel court system under sharia law.
(Page 2 of 2)
The Taliban's show of force has sowed fear and sparked heated debates throughout Pakistani society, with editorials calling Swat a linchpin for Pakistan's further demise into militancy. The News warns:Skip to next paragraph
Israeli general hints at another Gaza campaign
Unclaimed attack on Islamic school raises tension in Nigeria
See no evil? Activists doubt credibility of Arab League mission to Syria.
Arab League observers head to Syria's war-ravaged Homs
Christmas church bombings put global spotlight on 'Nigerian Taliban' (VIDEO)
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
It seems obvious that the militant 'victory' in Swat has encouraged similar action in other areas.... Anyone who had hoped the sordid events in Swat would be restricted to that area was obviously not thinking along realistic lines. The question is what the authorities are doing to combat this and save a society that stands on the very brink of anarchy.
The New York Times reports that both Pakistan's civilian government and military have responded weakly to the situation in Swat, failing even to curtail the Taliban's highly effective use of radio.
In the view of analysts, the growing nightmare in Swat is a capsule of the country's problems: an ineffectual and unresponsive civilian government, coupled with military and security forces that, in the view of furious residents, have willingly allowed the militants to spread terror deep into Pakistan....
Nor have troops destroyed mobile radio transmitters mounted on motorcycles or pickup trucks that Shah Doran and the leader of the Taliban in Swat, Maulana Fazlullah, have expertly used to terrify residents.
Being named in one of the nightly broadcasts often leaves just two options: fleeing Swat, or turning up headless and dumped in a village square.
The rise of Fazlullah exposes the economic and political failures fanning extremism even in these areas, and hints at the consequences, both for Pakistan and the international community, if the province continues down a path of deprivation. Allow him to persist, many observers say, and others will be emboldened to roll back the state's policies of moderation – small but symbolically important gains in women's empowerment, girls' education, and religious tolerance.
Because Swat is part of settled Pakistani territory, it is unlikely that the Obama administration will take any action to quell violence there. As it is, President Obama already faces challenges to continuing controversial missile strikes along Pakistan's border with Afghanistan, reports The New York Times:
"The immediate issue facing Mr. Obama as he descends into the Situation Room to begin weighing the options ... is whether he plans to continue the operations over the border into the territory of Pakistan, an ally, that President Bush secretly authorized last July....
[T]he new administration knows that until the Taliban no longer has a sanctuary in Pakistan, the conflict in Afghanistan is, in the words of one member of the Joint Chiefs, "a war without end."
The question is how much hard power Mr. Obama wants to blend into his smart power mix – a question Mr. Biden and his colleagues are unlikely to be able to dodge for long."
While the Obama administration weighs its options, many in Pakistan are counseling political settlements with Swat's Taliban. An opinion piece in The Daily Times reads:
"Clearly, a negotiated peace is the best option but it should not be a synonym for the surrender of the writ of the state. In the alternative, force has to be judiciously but effectively used to restore confidence in a terrorised populace."