Is Obama 'dangerous' because he wants you to buy a Chevy Volt? Newt says yes.
Newt Gingrich is railing against President Obama for using federal money to subsidize hybrid plug-ins like the Chevy Volt, likening the vehicle to 'cultural warfare.' Some Republicans agree.
(Page 2 of 2)
In a case of role reversal, Republicans have said that federal subsidies for cars that appeal mostly to rich people show that Obama is out of touch with ordinary Americans. Obama has repeatedly said that Republicans are out of touch with ordinary Americans because they refuse to consider tax increases on the rich.Skip to next paragraph
In Pictures Newt, now and then
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Gingrich and many Republican pundits want to end subsidies for the Volt and all electric vehicles. Currently, the federal government provides a subsidy that allows for a $7,500 tax break for buyers of "advanced-technology" cars, including plug-in hybrids. Reports suggest that under Obama's new proposal, that subsidy would increase to $10,000 but could be given solely to the manufacturer – making it an incentive for manufacturers to produce electric cars, though manufacturers could pass those savings onto consumers.
The proposal is part of the administration’s goal of having 1 million advanced-technology vehicles on the roads by 2015.
But Republicans have suggested that the Obama administration might be cutting corners to meet that goal.
In January, the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held hearings to investigate whether the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration went easy on General Motors after a Volt caught fire following a crash test early last year.
The committee was investigating the six-month lapse between the crash test and the federal safety probe. Some Republicans suggested that the Obama administration was lenient because it is invested in helping to help make the venture a success.
During the hearing, Rep. Mike Kelly (R) of Pennsylvania displayed a slide of Obama sitting behind the wheel of a Volt at a GM plant, saying that the vehicle “is a halo car, not so much for General Motors, but for this administration. If General Motors thought this was a good investment, they would have launched it themselves.”
The attacks on the Volt correspond to a recent decline in sales: Volt sales dropped 61 percent in January from the previous month, according to Autodata. At the hearing, GM CEO Daniel Akerson complained that his company “did not engineer the Volt to become a political punching bag, and that’s what it has become.”
According Mr. Visnic of Edmunds.com, the sales drop likely has to do with nonpolitical factors: the Volt's limited utility, consumer confusion regarding the technology, stable fuel prices since the summer, and a sticker price that is much higher than for most compact cars.
GM, he says, has largely stayed out of the fray “with a large amount of restraint.”
On Tuesday Mr. Akerson told the Detroit News: “Our job is not to be politically oriented. Our job is to make the best of our second chance and we’re trying as hard as we can.”
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.