Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Jim Bunning delays vote; unemployed face first week without check

With Sen. Jim Bunning blocking a vote on extending unemployment benefits, some 205,000 Americans will not get a check this week, says the National Employment Law Project.

By Ron SchererStaff writer / March 2, 2010

Janie Lee of Ewbank, Ky., talks to another demonstrator while attending a rally in opposition to Republican Sen. Jim Bunning in Lexington, Ky., Tuesday.

Ed Reinke/AP

Enlarge

New York

Susan in Sarasota, Fla., says she may lose her house when, after Sen. Jim Bunning blocked a vote on extending unemployment benefits, her unemployment benefits run out.

Skip to next paragraph

“Imagine what I have to say daily to my six-year-old to explain why mommy and daddy are so sad all the time,” writes a woman in California, with a husband facing the prospect of no longer getting his unemployment check.

And a man in Chicago says that, without an extension of unemployment benefits, “I could go homeless soon.”

These stories are pouring into Congress as thousands of Americans, faced with an extremely tight job situation, are writing to urge an extension of federal unemployment benefits. According to an estimate from the National Employment Law Project (NELP) in New York, some 205,000 people per week could lose their unemployment checks, starting this week.

For several weeks, the US Senate has tried to extend the federal program for 30 days, but Sen. Jim Bunning (R) of Kentucky has blocked consideration, since he’s concerned over the rising budget deficit. He wants Congress to shift to a “pay as you go” mode for new spending. (The Monitor covered White House reaction to Bunning's one-man filibuster here.)

On Tuesday, Senator Bunning, who is not running for re-election, once again blocked a 30-day extension proposed by a fellow Republican, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. However, there were reports circulating that the Senate was still trying to work out a deal with the Kentucky senator. Bunning has proposed using leftover federal stimulus funds to pay for the short-term extension, which will cost about $10 billion.

“He was offered the same opportunity last Thursday and declined it, saying he would lose the vote,” says Judy Conti, federal advocacy coordinator for NELP, which advocates for the jobless. “All he has done is drag things out and make the program lapse, which will cost the states extra money to take down and then put back up again.” (For Monitor coverage of the states hit hardest by the delay, click here.)

Permissions