Seven states hit hard by Jim Bunning's delay on unemployment benefits
If Congress doesn't overcome Sen. Jim Bunning's resistance to extending unemployment benefits, more than 10,000 unemployed Americans in each of seven states will lose benefits starting this week.
Senator Jim Bunning (R) of Kentucky speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, in this Dec. 17 photo. Senator Bunning has delayed a deal in Congress to extend unemployment benefits. Some states will be hit harder than others if Congress doesn't act to reinstate benefits.
Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/MCT/File
As long as Jim Bunning delays a deal in Congress to extend unemployment benefits, states around the country will see unemployed Americans start to lose those benefits.
Skip to next paragraph-
Graphic Seven states will see 10,000 or more residents loss their unemployment benefits each week in March if Congress doesn't act to extend them.
(Rich Clabaugh / The Christian Science Monitor)
Recent posts
-
12.31.11
Credit card debt: Are consumers returning to bad habits? -
12.29.11
New Year's resolution (and modern fable): Spend more! -
12.28.11
In budget battle, voters are the 'adults in the room' -
12.24.11
Is the curtain falling on the eurozone? -
12.23.11
FedEx delivery video: Package thrown. FedEx apologizes on YouTube.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
But seven states will be hit harder than any others: Florida, New York, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Georgia.
All of them will see an average 10,000 or more workers each week lose their benefits this month if Senator Bunning continues to hold up legislation, according to the National Employment Law Project (NELP), a New York-based advocacy group for employment rights of lower-wage workers.
Take Florida. This month, an average 23,000 of its unemployed residents will lose benefits each week if Congress doesn't act. That's more than any other state – more than triple the number losing benefits in more populous California.
No. 2 New York and No. 3 Texas are not far behind. (Click on the chart at left.)
The variation has to do with how states qualified for the federal extended benefits, says Christine Riordan, a policy analyst with NELP.
Of course, the question facing these unemployed may be more about when they get an unemployment check rather than whether they get one. Congress in the past has extended unemployment benefits and made them retroactive when there were delays.
But even the loss of one weekly check could make life tough for those unemployed in the worst recession in decades.





These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.