No-fly list challenge: Why is Virginia man on the list?

No-fly list challenge: A Virginia man, stranded in Kuwait because he was on a secret, US government no-fly list, is challenging the list in federal court. His is one of three recent no-fly list legal challenges.

  • close
    Gulet Mohamed, 19, of Alexandria, Va., left, speaks to the media in 2011 after returning from Kuwait, at Dulles International Airport in Chantilly, Va. A federal judge on Jan. 22, 2014 allowed Mohamed's challenge to his placement on the no-fly list to go forward.
    (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption

A federal judge on Wednesday allowed a Virginia man's challenge to his placement on the no-fly list to go forward, three years after he was stranded in Kuwait.

U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga issued a 32-page written ruling rejecting arguments of government lawyers who wanted the case dismissed. Trenga said that Gulet Mohamed suffers significant harm from his apparent placement on the list and the Constitution gives him the right to challenge his no-fly status.

Trenga acknowledged that Mohamed's travel rights must be balanced against the government's duty to protect its citizens from terrorism, but wrote that "the No Fly List implicates some of our basic freedoms and liberties as well as the question of whether we will embrace those basic freedoms when it is most difficult."

Recommended: NSA surveillance 101: What US intelligence agencies are doing, what they know

The Justice Department is reviewing the ruling, department spokesman Wyn Hornbuckle said in an email late Wednesday.

The government has refused to say why it would have placed Mohamed on the no-fly list; in fact, the government won't even confirm that Mohamed, or anyone else, is on the list at all. The government says only that people are placed on the list when it has "reasonable suspicion to believe that a person is a known or suspected terrorist."

Trenga wrote that a citizen's right to due process should provide a meaningful opportunity to challenge the government's rationale for placement on the list.

Mohamed, an Alexandria resident and naturalized U.S. citizen, was 19 when he was detained by Kuwaiti authorities in 2011. Mohamed says he was beaten and interrogated at the behest of the U.S. and denied the right to fly home.

U.S. authorities allowed Mohamed to fly home after he filed a federal lawsuit, but Mohamed says he remains on the list without justification.

Mohamed's lawyer, Gadeir Abbas, who is with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called the ruling "a stinging rebuke to the government's use of the no-fly list."

"The strong language of Judge Trenga's ruling provides Gulet with what he has always wanted: his day in court," Abbas said.

Both sides will now exchange discovery in the case. The judge could eventually rule in favor of either side, or let the case go to a jury.

Mohamed's case is one of several at the leading edge of a wave of challenges to the constitutionality of the no-fly list. Last week, a federal judge in California ordered the government to remove a Malaysian architecture professor from the list in a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind. And a federal judge in Oregon is considering a similar challenge brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and has made pretrial rulings that have rejected some of the government's arguments.

"It's heartening to see that judges are rejecting or expressing skepticism about the government's impermissible secrecy claims," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project.

Trenga initially dismissed Mohamed's lawsuit, ruling that he lacked jurisdiction to hear it. But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond revived the suit last year.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.




Save for later


Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items


Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items


Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items