Mitt Romney: His super PAC burn rate soared in January
Mitt Romney had the biggest super PAC donations, and was the biggest spender. Can Rick Santorum's super PAC keep pace in Michigan and Arizona?
There’s plenty of buzz about campaign fund-raising, as a Federal Election Commission deadline Monday night brought forth a trove of data from the campaigns about their January spending.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
What do you need to know about the state of the campaign money game? Here are five things to note.
1. Show me the money - by state.
MapLight put together a chart showing that two out of every three dollars raised by super PACs - the groups that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money for presidential candidates without coordinating with said candidates - have come from just four states and Washington, D.C. Mitt Romney has raised the most super PAC cash in each of those locations, but you can slice and dice the numbers for yourself here.
2. How much mud would a super PAC chuck if a super PAC could chuck mud?
Answer: A lot more than last time around, that’s for sure. In the last GOP presidential tilt, just six percent of campaign advertising was an attack on other candidates, the Washington Post writes. During this campaign cycle, that number has shot up to more than 50 percent. Nearly three quarters of super PAC ads have been negative compared with 27 percent of ads from the campaigns themselves.
3. How do the GOP candidates compare to each other?
See this super helpful ABC News chart for the numeric breakdown, but here are DCDecoder’s takeaways. Mitt Romney had the biggest fund-raising haul of the Republican bunch - but he put $6.5 million in the tank versus $4.5 million to $5.5 million for each of his rivals.
What’s really amazing is how much Mitt Romney spent - $18.78 million. The New York Times’ Nate Silver thinks Romney’s “burn rate” - fund-raising minus spending - of negative $12.2 million might be the worst January ever. Rick Santorum saw his cash on hand grow by about $1 million while Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich had losses in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Romney’s burn rate looks even worse when you add in the net negative $7 million hit his super PAC took in January. Still, his $24 million in cash between the super PAC and his campaign dwarf the other candidates’ combined holdings.