Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

State of the Union: Why Obama energy blueprint has Republicans fuming (+video)

Obama's State of the Union endorsement of an 'all of the above' strategy for energy production rankled Republicans, who see it as disingenuous given his Keystone XL pipeline rejection and fracking probes.

By Staff writer / January 25, 2012

President Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington Tuesday night. Obama hit on several dozen topics during his speech, but his statements on energy policy rankled congressional Republicans the most.

Larry Downing/Reuters

Enlarge

Washington

President Obama hit several dozen topics in his State of the Union address Tuesday night, but none rankled congressional Republicans quite like his statements on energy policy.

Skip to next paragraph
Downed US Drone: How Iran Caught the "Beast"
World News Videos by NewsLook

“On a scale from one to outrageous, it was closer to outrageous,” said Rep. Phil Gingrey (R) of Georgia.

When Mr. Obama boomed that America needed “an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy,” the GOP side of the aisle leapt to its feet in applause -- but with many wry smiles blooming throughout the chamber. Why the ironic disposition?

It wasn’t so much the content of the president’s speech that had Republicans spitting tacks in the post-speech spin room. It’s that they believe the president, as Representative Gingrey put it, “says one thing and does something else.”

Obama promised to “open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources,” which GOP lawmakers saw as taking almost everything except for the Gulf of Mexico out of the drilling equation.

While they didn’t dispute the president’s assertion that America sits atop a store of natural gas that could last for a century, Republicans saw the administration as giving with one hand while taking with the other.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R) of California, chairman of the House Government Oversight Committee, called Obama’s pledge to require the disclosure of ingredients used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a technique responsible for accessing America’s copious amounts of shale gas, a “not-so-veiled-threat.”

“These are trade secrets,” Representative Issa said. “He has a right to get a sample of the chemical they’re putting down – that’s very different than making them disclose their secret ingredients. And I’m sure he drinks Diet Coke, I’m sure he’d like that recipe too – but it’s not his right.”

Shale gas, or natural gas trapped in sedimentary rock formations, is projected to become a massive part of US natural-gas production. The most recent estimate from the US Energy Information Administration, released Monday, projects that shale gas production will balloon from 23 percent of American natural-gas production in 2010 to nearly 50 percent by 2035.

Speaking of two ongoing investigations into the environmental impacts of fracking at the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Interior, Issa said the president is well on his way to halting the extraction of such resources even as he praised them in the State of the Union.

Permissions

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story

  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer

 

Election blogs

 

 

More coverage  (View all)

In pictures

Powered by LetsPoll.com Poll Engine

Election tweets

Twitter: Join the conversation
Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!