Subscribe

Google chairman: We’re making 'real progress' on artificial intelligence

Recent and future breakthroughs in artificial intelligence will help us solve big problems in genomics, energy, and climate science, Google chairman Eric Schmidt wrote in an op-ed.

  • close
    Google chairman Eric Schmidt predicted in an op-ed that artificial intelligence would soon replace traditional approaches to solving big problems in fields such as energy and climate science. Here, Schmidt and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg speak at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on January 22, 2015.
    Jean-Christophe Bott/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

We’ve built computers that can outplay the finest chess grandmasters in the world, virtual personal assistants that can schedule tasks and control our homes, and algorithms that can predict with increasing accuracy what we’ll want to watch, read, or listen to next.

But true artificial intelligence – a computer that can solve a wide range of problems through reason, planning, abstraction, and learning – hasn’t come about yet. There are machines that are better than humans at specific tasks, but no machine that’s as good as or better than a human at thinking.

We’re getting close to that point, though, Google chairman Eric Schmidt argued in an op-ed for the BBC on Saturday. Mr. Schmidt says artificial intelligence (AI) research has been steadily building since the term was first coined in 1955, and that scientists have made a few big breakthroughs in the past several years.

Recommended: Despite sci-fi tropes, robots make better managers, study says

One of those breakthroughs, Schmidt writes, came from a team led by AI pioneer Geoff Hinton. In 2009, Dr. Hinton’s team beat the state of the art for automated speech recognition and immediately cut the number of errors in Google’s speech recognition engine by 25 percent, “the equivalent of ten years of research all at once.”

At around the same time, AI was boosted by Big Data – thousands of computers all networked together, providing resources from which machines could learn. That sort of networking allowed computers to begin tackling problems such as identifying a written language from a picture or a spoken language from a sound file, or recognizing the subject of an image. (It’s trivial for a person to look at a picture of a dog and recognize that it’s a dog, but that kind of identification was, until recently, very difficult for computers.)

Schmidt says it’s important for AI researchers to direct their efforts toward solving real-world problems such as automatically filtering e-mails and social media posts for users, planning vacations, or even finding the next pop superstar.

“A decade ago, to launch a digital music service, you probably would have enlisted a handful of elite tastemakers to pick the hottest new music,” Schmidt writes. “Today, you're much better off building a smart system that can learn from the real world - what actual listeners are most likely to like next - and help you predict who and where the next Adele might be.”

Schmidt predicts that machine learning, and artificial intelligence more generally, will improve at an increasing rate in the next several years, and that an algorithmic approach to big problems in areas such as genomics, energy, and climate science will wholly replace a traditional approach.

Recommended: Despite sci-fi tropes, robots make better managers, study says

“In the next generation of software, machine learning won't just be an add-on that improves performance a few percentage points,” Schmidt writes.

There’s no telling when, or even whether, true artificial intelligence will be created, but the Google chairman argues that breakthroughs in this area could be instrumental to solving the biggest problems facing humanity.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK