Innocence amid the Israel-Hamas war

Even as the war escalates, it has renewed faith in global norms for the safety of civilians as a principle of international law.

|
Reuters
Israeli forces drive in southern Israel as rockets are launched from the Gaza Strip, Oct. 7.

It is impossible not to feel the world’s deep anguish over yet another war with a heavy toll for civilians. After deadly cross-border attacks by Palestinian Hamas fighters last weekend, Israel is preparing a military operation into the Gaza Strip. The crisis comes at a moment when the Middle East appeared to be moving into a new era of warmer relations between Israel and many Arab states.

Yet even as the war escalates, it is also triggering widespread calls for the protection of the innocent, one of the principles in international humanitarian law and a value that strengthens the possibility of peace.

“It should be possible to stand with the residents” of the villages in southern Israel struck by Hamas “while still remembering that living on the other side are human beings just like them,” wrote Gideon Levy, an Israeli journalist, in Haaretz. “It should be possible, even in the current atmosphere, to speak about Gaza in human terms.”

The crisis has elevated concern for civilians for obvious reasons. Hamas has killed Israeli citizens and taken many as hostages. Israel has shut off supplies of water, food, fuel, and electricity to Gaza, an urban strip along the Mediterranean Sea. A military operation to hunt down militants risks a steep civilian toll. “Separating Hamas from Gaza is an almost impossible task,” Daniel Byman, a Georgetown University international studies professor, told The Economist.

U.S. President Joe Biden warned of the potential humanitarian cost of a large-scale military response. “It is really important that Israel, with all the anger and frustration ... that exists, is that they operate by the rules of war,” he said at the White House last night. Those concerns are shared. The United Arab Emirates Foreign Ministry stressed the need to “preserve the lives of civilians, and offered its sincere condolences to all the victims who fell as a result of the recent fighting.”

One effect of the current crisis may be a rediscovery of the global norm to protect the innocent. Under humanitarian law enshrined in the 1949 Geneva Conventions, a person has inherent innocence. Every Muslim nation is a signatory of the Geneva Conventions, which encodes the principle of protecting civilians. That support reflects a coincidence between Islamic law and humanitarian law. “A Muslim is conscious of God during war and armed conflict and strictly adheres to the norms of warfare, respecting human dignity,” wrote Zuhdija Hasanović, dean of the Faculty of Islamic Studies at the University of Sarajevo in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in a 2020 book. “And if he has this consciousness during war, how can he not have so during peace?”

That view, wrote Daniel Reisel, co-founder of the London-based Jewish organization Yachad, is consistent with Jewish law based on “Abraham’s imperative not to harm the innocent among the enemy.”

In a speech at the Austrian Center for Peace in July, Robert Mardini, director-general of the International Committee of the Red Cross, argued that the “single most effective way to reduce suffering in war is to uphold the fundamental principle of humanity.” At a time when more than a hundred conflicts worldwide threaten the safety of civilians, that principle is already getting a fresh look in Gaza and Israel.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Innocence amid the Israel-Hamas war
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2023/1012/Innocence-amid-the-Israel-Hamas-war
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe