On financial reform, Dodd gives activist shareholders more power
His Senate financial-reform bill includes provisions that give activist shareholders more say in the election of company directors.
Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) of Connecticut (center) talked with Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (left) and Sen. Mark Warner (D) of Virginia on Capitol Hill March 16. His finance reform proposal includes language tht would give shareholders more power to elect directors.
Harry Hamburg/AP
Senator Chris Dodd rolled out a Financial Reform bill draft yesterday, and contrary to what many expected, the governance proposals all remained intact. Dodd has this one correct in my opinion, I just don't know if he has the juice to get it done seeing as how he's lame ducked himself and the White House seems to be nowhere near this issue right now.
Skip to next paragraph
Joshua has been managing money for high net worth clients, charitable foundations, corporations and retirement plans for more than a decade.
Recent posts
Anyway, here are the provisions that are relevant to activist shareholders and corporate governance types...
From RiskMetrics Blog:
Section 971 would direct the SEC to act within one year to direct the national securities exchanges (e.g., the NYSE and Nasdaq) to require majority voting as a listing standard. This provision would authorize the SEC to exempt issuers based on market capitalization or the number of shareholders. This provision would require a unanimous board vote to reject the resignation of a director who fails to win a majority of votes cast.
Section 972 would authorize the SEC to adopt a proxy access rule “for the protection of investors,” but the bill doesn’t set any specific standards. The House bill has similar language.
The bill includes provisions (Section 954) concerning the “claw back” of “erroneously awarded” compensation, as well as language (Section 952) that seeks to strengthen compensation committee independence and the independence of committee advisers.
Most of this stuff is commonsensical and will probably not meet with much resistance. Imagine a world where corporate execs are actually responsible for their actions! We'll talk more about what this means for investors on Stock Wars tomorrow night.
Add/view comments on this post.
--------------------------
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.
Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube