Unemployment benefits for long-term jobless unworkable: Boehner

Unemployment benefits renewal would create difficulties, according to states administering the unemployment benefits. House Speaker Boehner leaves open a possible future compromise over the renewal outlined in a bipartisan Senate bill. 

By , Associated Press

  • close
    Sen. Jack Reed (D) of Rhode Island (center) confers with Sen. Dean Heller (R) of Nevada (right), negotiators of a bipartisan bill to renew long-term unemployment benefits, confer in February. Sen. Robert Menendez (D) of New Jersey is at far left.
    View Caption

Bipartisan Senate legislation to renew benefits for the long-term unemployed is unworkable, House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday as aides circulated a letter from state officials envisioning a series of difficulties they would encounter in administering the measure.

The speaker did not say flatly that the House would shelve the bill if it clears the Senate, leaving open the possibility of a future compromise. But a blog posting by his aides quoted the Ohio Republican as saying there was "no evidence that the bill being rammed through the Senate by (Majority) Leader (Harry) Reid" would help create more private sector jobs.

In response, a spokesman for Reid, Adam Jentleson, said the legislation is bipartisan and the concerns expressed by state officials can be resolved.

Recommended: Five best and worst states for job growth

"We look forward to Speaker Boehner coming to the table to find solutions," Jentleson said, adding it is "hard to imagine Speaker Boehner simply walking away from the thousands of people in Ohio who lost their jobs through no fault of their own and need this lifeline to make ends meet while they continue to look for work."

In their letter, the National Association of State Workforce Agencies, which administers unemployment benefit programs, said it has "significant concerns about the implementation of the legislation."

The letter added that "some states have indicated they might decide such changes are not feasible in the short time available, and therefore would consider not signing the U.S. Department of Labor's agreement to operate the program."

Among other issues, the letter said most states have outdated computer systems that make it hard to implement any changes to the program quickly, and it's not clear how states would pay for administrative costs if federal funds cannot be spent to determine eligibility.

One of the provisions in the Senate compromise is a prohibition on individuals with million-dollar earnings from earning unemployment benefits.

The letter also cited the potential for a large number of overpayments as a result of the bill's requirement for benefits dating back to the end of last year.

The Senate is expected to debate the measure shortly after it returns on Monday from a weeklong break. Under a compromise announced earlier in the month, a program of benefits would be renewed for five months, effective when it expired on Dec. 28.

The program generally benefited workers laid off more than six months, an estimated 2 million of whom have lost payments since it expired.

The Senate proposal has the support of at least five Republicans, meaning that unless there are Democratic defections, it will have enough support to achieve a 60-vote majority and overcome any GOP stalling tactics. It resulted from lengthy negotiations led by Sens. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Dean Heller, R-Nev., whose states have among the highest joblessness in the country.

Share this story:
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...