Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac regulator throws lifeline to underwater homeowners
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: The overhaul, which would only help a fraction of the country's 11 million underwater borrowers, is the latest government effort to breathe life into the crippled US housing market.
WASHINGTON — U.S. homeowners who owe more than their properties are worth got new help Monday with the government's expansion of a refinancing program in a step that could help up to 1 million borrowers.
The regulator of mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac eased the terms of a program that helps so-called underwater borrowers who have made payments on time but have been unable to refinance.
"These are important steps that will help more homeowners refinance at lower rates, save consumers money and help get folks spending again,'' President Barack Obama said in remarks to the press and a handful of neighbors standing outside of a house in Las Vegas, where he had met with a family that benefited from his housing programs.
The Nevada city was hard hit by the foreclosure crisis.
The overhaul, which would only help a fraction of the country's 11 million underwater borrowers, is the latest government effort to breathe life into the crippled U.S. housing market.
Officials have been frustrated that numerous attempts to bolster the sector and help borrowers have had little success.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency said it was scrapping a cap that prohibited borrowers whose mortgages exceeded 125 percent of their property's value from refinancing loans backed by FannieMae and Freddie Mac under the government's Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP).
It also took steps to coax homeowners into shorter-term loans and encourage more banks to participate in the program.
The Obama administration sees lowering mortgage payments as a way to free up cash for other spending that could help support the economy's tepid recovery.
"It has the added negative effect of transferring consequences, liabilities, and risks from the financial institutions which entered into loans that are now underwater ultimately to taxpayers,'' Bachus said in a statement.
The FHFA said it wanted to focus on loans made between 2004-08, when borrowers typically locked into rates above 5 percent. Currently, 30-year fixed mortgage rates are hovering just over 4 percent.
"Such modifications are no panacea, but they would move us in the right direction for housing-related stimulus for the economy,'' said Janaki Rao, vice president for mortgage research at Morgan Stanley inNew York.
The White House expects homeowners refinancing under the program to save as much as $2,500 per household each year.
Investors in mortgage-backed securities, who had anticipated a revamping of the program, were surprised at the scope of the changes, and prices for housing debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dropped sharply.
With political gridlock blocking legislation addressing the housing crisis, the administration had urged the FHFA to widen HARP to more borrowers. The regulator had moved cautiously, wary of piling too much risk on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
"This is an appropriate balancing of risk that's being borne by Fannie and Freddie, and hence the American taxpayer,'' FHFA's acting director, Edward DeMarco, said in a conference call with reporters. "This will make HARP more available.''
In September 2008, the U.S. government seized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two largest sources of U.S. mortgage financing, as losses on loans they backed spiraled. The two firms have so far received $141 billion in taxpayer bailouts.
After meeting with DeMarco earlier this month, one lawmaker said the expanded program could help as many as 600,000 to 1 million borrowers.
DeMarco and Obama administration officials said there was no way to forecast exactly how many borrowers could benefit, although the FHFA said it could double the number helped by the end of 2013. Previously, the program was due to expire in June.
There were some signs the announcement was having an impact.
Las Vegas-based mortgage originator Ben Petkewich said he had five clients who might qualify for the relaxed terms -- four paying 6 percent a year and another paying more than 8 percent.
"I got two phone calls this morning and have pulled three files,'' said Petkewich who runs The Mortgage Outlet. "I'm a one-person shop. That's a significant amount of business for me to look into.''
The state of Nevada has the highest foreclosure rate in the United States.
The White House has been criticized for over-selling earlier efforts to help housing. When HARP was unveiled in March 2009, it predicted it would help 5 million borrowers, but so far fewer than 895,000 have refinanced through the program.
Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan said the overhaul was "only one piece of a broader strategy to help the housing market.'' He said the next step would be to find a way to rent, sell or dispose of foreclosed homes that are weighing on already depressed prices.
With housing impeding a broader economic recovery, some Federal Reserve officials have said the central bank should consider buying mortgage debt to drive down borrowing costs.
To encourage banks to participate in the revamped program, FHFA moved to protect lenders from having to buy back loans if underwriting problems are later found. "Of all the barriers, this may be the most significant,'' said Gene Sperling, director of the White House National Economic Council.
In addition, banks will only have to verify that borrowers have made their last six mortgage payments and, in most cases, they will not need to conduct an appraisal.
FHFA said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will also eliminate certain fees for borrowers who refinance into shorter-duration loans, in a bid to spur homeowners to pay down the amount they owe more quickly.
Morgan Stanley's Rao said while the changes were helpful, they were unlikely to lead to a "wave'' of refinancing.
Many economists have argued bolder steps are needed given the weight housing is placing on the recovery.
"With constructive approaches by independent regulators, far better policies could be in place six months from now,'' he wrote. "There is nothing else on the feasible political horizon that can make as a large a difference in driving American economic recovery.''