Heidi Klum: no makeup for charity, 'empowerment.' Really?

Heidi Klum is ditching her lipstick as part of a BBC Children in Need 'Go BearFaced' campaign, which encourages women to spend Nov. 9 without makeup. But one mom wonders: How do more Heidi Klum photos help girls?

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
Heidi Klum arriving at the 64th Primetime Emmy Awards at the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles, Sept. 23, 2012.

Even without makeup, Heidi Klum still looks great.

Feel empowered yet?

You should, according to the new BBC Children in Need “Go BearFaced” campaign.

Yes, the corporate charity of the British Broadcasting Company is encouraging women across the world to ditch their makeup Nov. 9 – just like Heidi! – and instead draw or attach a little paw print symbol on their cheek. This is a “really simple way to raise money for a great cause,” the group says, because women should be able to get sponsors for this “brave” move, the same way they would if they were running a charity race.

Because, you know, it should take about the same effort for a modern woman to leave behind her lipstick for a day as it would be for her to run a marathon. Or at least a 10K.

Anyhow, if you need more inspiration for getting BearFaced, you can go to the BBC Children in Need website, where you can scroll through beautifully-lit photos of female celebrities not wearing makeup. There you will find Ms. Klum, a former Victoria’s Secret Angel, who attests to be “so proud” to be taking part in the campaign because she is a “firm believer of encouraging women’s empowerment.”

Also featured (and gorgeous) is English singer and media personality Louise Redknapp, as well as English television presenter Caroline Flack.

Go girl power!

Or something.

Now, we’re all for girls’ “empowerment” here.  And for raising money for needy kids. But I’m having some trouble with this one.

Perhaps it's because I am missing the connection between disadvantaged kids in the UK and beautiful “BearFaced” celebrities, let alone the link between fundraising and everyday women not wearing makeup.

It seems that building a charity campaign around a daring lack of eye-liner is perpetrating just those stereotypes about girls and beauty the group says it is against; it assumes that makeup is so pervasive, and so dear to women, that it would take some real effort – some bravery, even – to appear without it.

And I know, from first hand experience, this does not need to be the case.

I mean, I could raise money every day if someone sponsored me to not wear eye shadow. Start adding bonus funds for the tired-mommy-can’t-find-that-year-old-stick-of-mascara-that-even-the-manufacturer-says-to-throw-away look, and I’m telling you, I’m your spokeswoman.

But even if I’m in the minority on this one – a few months back, the hosts of 'The Talk' also made a splash when they launched their third season with a makeup-free show – you still have an “empowerment” campaign that is focused on physical beauty.

And even if it's in the name of disadvantaged kids, that should probably make us pause.

With or without lipstick.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Heidi Klum: no makeup for charity, 'empowerment.' Really?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today