Amanda Todd bullying suicide: "Nice it Forward" in her memory

What can we individually do after the case of Canadian teen Amanda Todd, who committed suicide after cyber bullying drove her to produce a video detailing her cruel experiences? Join the "Nice it Forward" campaign, in her memory.

The Christian Science Monitor/Joanne Ciccarello
Amanda Todd's story brings fresh meaning to Haley Kilpatrick's organization Girl Talk, a mentoring program that pairs high school and middle school girls to help younger girls avoid teasing and cyberbullying. In the past nine years, more than 32,000 girls in 39 states have joined, Atlanta, Ga., Dec. 6, 2010.

The sad story of Canadian teenager Amanda Todd, who self-produced a video about being bullied and then killed herself weeks later, has prompted a new round of outrage about cyberbullying.

RELATED: Top 5 bullying myths - What you don't know about bullying

Police, parents and school officials have cited Ms. Todd’s case in saying they need to increase efforts – and possibly laws – against this sort of harassment, in which perpetrators target victims through cell phone text messaging, on Facebook, or in other neighborhoods of the virtual world. Meanwhile, social networking sites have hosted tens of thousands of comments decrying what many see as this overwhelming, negative phenomenon in the lives of today’s teenagers; the nasty comments on memorial pages set up for Todd seem to only reinforce the sense that cyberbullies are omnipresent.

It’s hard not to join in with the anger; to feel like there’s just something terribly wrong with society, teens and the Internet today.

But even in the face of horrible stories like this one, it’s important to step back.

While many studies have shown that a large number of teens experience cyberbullying, which the Pew Internet & American Life Project describes as online harassment that is repeated over time and involves a power imbalance between a perpetrator and a victim, most do not.

Research tends to put the number of teens who experience online harassment between 9 percent and 33 percent; much of the difference in those numbers comes from how research questions are asked and from the demographics of those interviewed. Most teens (67 percent), according to Pew’s own research, think bullying and harassment happen more often offline.

Moreover, there is a new trend among teens using the Internet, reports Justin Patchin, an associate professor at the University of Wisconsin-Eu Claire and co-director of the Cyberbullying Research Center. This, he writes, is the push to “Nice it Forward,” an effort to use social media to say nice things about other people.

While we often hear the grim stories of bullies setting up fake Facebook pages to humiliate or slam other people, those who Nice it Forward, Dr. Patchin writes, do just the opposite. They create or join Twitter handles where the entire purpose is to say random nice things about their school or classmates. Sometimes this is done to specifically counter nasty Internet sites; sometimes it is just, well, to be nice.

“I really love this,” he writes on the Cyberbullying Research Center website. Co-director Sameer Hinduja “and I have long advocated for getting students involved in activities to prevent bullying and for empowering teens to do their part to develop a positive climate at their school ...  Teens from around the country are stepping up, even without the prodding of adults, to show their classmates that bullying is not cool.”

None of this, mind you, is meant to downplay the impact of cyber harassment. Unlike traditional bullying, cyber bullying and harassment can be extra problematic, some researchers say, because it follows children home. There’s no leaving the schoolyard behind when the cell phone text messages are coming at all hours, or when a teen is worried about what’s being posted to her Facebook page.

(One solution here, some advocates say, is to keep teens from Facebook and other social media sites that are more likely to perpetrate anonymous meanness. But easier said than done, say many parents.)

According to Pew’s research, 38 percent of older teens who are online report experiencing some sort of harassment; a good percentage of them (but far from the majority) report  being “upset” or “extremely upset” by the experience.

Still, it's clear from study after study that cyber-meanness is not the norm.

As for Todd's case, it is too soon to know what actually happened. We understand from the video that she posted in September, in which she does not speak but holds up a number of cards with writing on them to tell her story, that she has had a terribly rough few years. Her troubles started, she said, when she was 12 years old and messing around with friends on a webcam, and agreed to flash a stranger who had flattered her. This person had stalked her ever since, trying to blackmail her and sending the picture to friends and relatives.

She had other troubles with classmates, and says that she struggled with anxiety, drugs, and alcohol. This is not atypical; although it may be hard to distinguish which factor came first, teens who are bullied also have higher levels of depression, psychological problems, substance abuse, and delinquency.

The lines here, then, between depression, cyber bullying, child abuse, harassment and drama are impossible to determine from afar. They’re probably incredibly difficult to untangle close up.

RELATED: Are you a 'Helicopter Parent?' take our QUIZ!

All we know for sure is that Todd’s story is horribly sad. 

And whether her story is unusual or not, an example of cyber bullying or something else, we can only hope that it will inspire other teens to Nice it Forward. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.