Iran nuclear talks yield only one agreement: Let's meet again
Absent from the five marathon sessions in Moscow over Iran's nuclear program were any new incentives, from either side, to signal that compromise is imminent or even possible.
Chief Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili speaks to the media after talks on the controversial Iranian nuclear program in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, June 19.
Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP
Moscow
Iran and world powers have agreed to continue negotiations at a technical level over Iran's nuclear program, staving off a collapse of talks after two days of difficult discussions in Moscow, where hard-line positions did not budge.
Skip to next paragraphBoth sides portrayed the other as having a "choice" to pursue diplomacy and avert a war over Iran's advanced nuclear program. Israel and some Western governments believe the program aims to produce nuclear weapons, a charge that Iran denies.
Diplomats on both sides used similar language to describe "significant gaps" that remain, and to question how long this process of talks can be sustained. Absent from the five marathon sessions in Moscow were any new incentives, from either side, to signal that compromise is imminent or even possible.
The P5+1 group (the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany) held fast to its demands that Iran stop its most sensitive uranium enrichment work, close a deeply buried facility, and ship out its stockpile of 20 percent enriched material. Iran also had to accept "full implementation" of UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions, which require total suspension of enrichment – and which Iran rejects.
Likewise, Iran held fast to its demand that the P5+1 recognize its "inalienable right" to enrich uranium "at all levels," and to remove increasingly severe sanctions that are damaging its economy.
The two sides late last night agreed to hold a technical meeting July 3 in Istanbul, Turkey, to better "understand" and "study" each other's positions. This is to be followed by contact between political deputies, and finally direct contact between chief negotiators Catherine Ashton for the P5+1 and Saeed Jalili for Iran about a possible next meeting.
No breakthrough initiatives
But, aside from far more detailed explanations of positions, there was little evidence of new flexibility.
"We did not put on the table significant sanctions relief," said a senior US administration official. Instead sanctions would be "ongoing and intensifying" as US measures targeting Iran's central bank and a European oil embargo come into force next week.
"All of our sanctions will go into effect on July 1, and there will be further sanctions to come, so our dual-track policy is not changing," said the senior US official. "Because we are in negotiations, the second track, the pressure track, is not stopping because in fact they haven't taken any concrete action."
"The choice is Iran's ... to decide whether it is willing to make diplomacy work," said Ms. Ashton, the European Union foreign policy chief who represents the P5+1, at the close of talks.
Iran's position
The Iranians, in their turn, say it is the P5+1 that must act first, to reassure Iranians that their rights under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT] will be respected, and that sanctions relief will come in exchange for concessions.
"They have the option to take the right choice," Mr. Jalili, the head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, told journalists after the talks. "Today they are facing a great test, in order to obtain the confidence of the Iranian people. Today they are ... at a juncture of deciding to come out of the deadlock and take steps that lead to cooperation."









These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.