Subscribe

Iran's nuclear deal starts to end after 10 years, not 15 years (+video)

A confidential document, part of the Iran nuclear deal, says nuclear research can restart in less than 15 years. 

  • close
    Young Iranian men cheer and show victory signs in July 2015 while holding a picture of Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, reading "Zarif is Mosaddegh of our time," comparing Zarif to Mohammad Mosaddegh, Iran's legendary prime minister during the 1950s who nationalized the country's oil industry, in Tehran. A document obtained by the Associated Press on July 18, 2016, says key nuclear restrictions on Iran will ease in a little more than a decade, halving the time Tehran would need to build a bomb if it chose to do so.
    Ebrahim Noroozi/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

A confidential document from the Iran nuclear deal, which was recently leaked to the Associated Press, allows Iran to expand its uranium enrichment program after the first 10 years of the deal, even though the overall agreement lasts 15 years.

The document was given to the Associated Press by a diplomat whose work focused on Iran’s nuclear program and who described the document as “an add-on agreement to the nuclear deal in the form of a document submitted by Iran to the International Atomic Energy Agency.” The IAEA is the United Nations' watchdog on nuclear research. The authenticity of the document was confirmed by an additional diplomat with access to the document.

The nuclear deal, signed a year ago, was intended to prevent Iran’s proclaimed peaceful nuclear research from being directed at making weapons. In exchange, the US would lift many of the economic sanctions that had been in place since the Iranian hostage crisis in 1979. However, details were foggy on what would happen when the stipulations of the deal expire, which varies from 10 to 15 years.

This document clears up some of that uncertainty: In 2027, 11 years after the deal was made, Iran can replace the old centrifuges with new ones that are five times as efficient, effectively boosting Iran’s uranium enrichment capacity. The AP says that means Iran could have enough enriched uranium to make a nuclear bomb in six months.

One of the key arguments used by proponents to sell the deal to skeptics was that it lengthened the “break out” period to build a nuclear bomb  – from two or three months to at least 12 months. The State Department says that this most recent document does not negate that.

“The prohibition on Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon – and our ability to monitor the peaceful nature of its nuclear program – remains in effect indefinitely,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner told the Associated Press.  “The breakout time does not go off a cliff nor do we believe that it would be cut in half, to six months, by year 11.”

US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz told The AP  said the document obtained by the AP posed no contradiction to 12 months breakout claim because "we made it very clear that we were focused on 10 years on the minimum one-year breakout time."

When it was signed, many Iranian and US leaders considered the deal a landmark of foreign policy success. President Obama, who has a legacy of interacting with adversaries, was able to make the case that the world was safer as a result of sustained diplomatic efforts not seen in decades between the two nations.

Still, there has been some pessimism on both sides since well before this latest document was released.

“In terms of nonproliferation, Year 1 [of the deal] has been good,” Karim Sadjadpour, Iran analyst with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, told The Christian Science Monitor on July 14. “But I’m not as optimistic as others that this is going to reach its 10-year anniversary.”

For Iranians, public opinion on the deal has suffered because of overly high expectations about its capacity to restore the country’s crumbling economy.

In America, opinions on the deal both for and against have not changed much since last summer when the deal was signed. On one side, 75 national security leaders recently sent a letter to Obama calling for the deal to serve as a model for expanding diplomacy with Iran. On the other, there are are 35 pieces of legislation in Congress related to changing the deal that are currently under debate. 

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK