Trial of pope's butler: Journalists admitted, but secret evidence not
Paolo Gabriele, the once-trusted valet who used to dress the 85-year-old German pontiff, is charged under Vatican law with the 'aggravated theft' of confidential papers.
(Page 2 of 2)
The list of witnesses to be called at Gabriele’s trial, announced at the hearing on Saturday, shows how the scandal has reached deep into the inner sanctums of the Holy See. They include Georg Ganswein, the pope’s personal secretary; Domenico Giani, the head of the Vatican Gendarmerie, the city-state’s 130-strong police force; and William Kloter, the deputy commandant of the Swiss Guard, the pope’s personal bodyguard.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The trial and its repercussions present another difficulty for the pope, who has spent much of his papacy trying to address and contain outrage over hundreds of cases in which priests sexually molested children in their charge. The sex abuse scandal has affected countries around the world, including the United States, Australia, Ireland, and Germany.
While the butler’s trial has attracted massive media coverage in Italy, the level of scrutiny does not necessarily match the interest of ordinary Catholics.
“I’m not particularly interested in the trial, and it hasn’t made much of an impression on me,” says Claudio Bondi, an accountant enjoying a walk in a park near the Vatican with his two children. “It seems like an internal affair for the Vatican and not something that affects ordinary people very much.”
Gabriele faces up to four years in prison if found guilty of stealing the documents.
At Saturday’s hearing he was not required to enter a plea, but he can expect to face tough questioning from Vatican prosecutors when the trial resumes on Tuesday.
During a hearing that lasted just over two hours, the panel of three judges agreed to a request from lawyers to split Gabriele’s trial from that of Claudio Sciarpelletti – a Vatican computer technician who is accused of abetting the theft and leaking the confidential documents.
Just the two?
The key issue is whether the two men acted on their own, as loose cannons, or whether they were pawns who were fed the documents by much more senior figures in the church.
In a significant development that may mean the true extent of the conspiracy will never emerge, the three judges in the trial ruled that evidence gathered in secret by a specially commissioned panel of cardinals will not be admitted in court.
The panel, appointed personally by the pope and led by the 82-year-old Spanish Cardinal Julian Herranz Casado, a prominent member of the Opus Dei movement, delivered their findings to the pope over the summer.
But the court rejected a defense request for their investigation to be aired in the hearing.
The trial could have been held behind closed doors, and the fact that it is open to the press – albeit on a restricted pool basis – is evidence that the church wants to deal with the affair openly, Vatican figures said.
“The trial will be fair and respectful of the rights both of the defence and the prosecution,” Cardinal Velasio De Paolis, a Vatican jurist and trusted confidant of the pope, told La Repubblica newspaper on Sunday.
He said the evidence gathered by prosecutors suggested that Gabriele had acted on his own initiative, with some help from Mr. Sciarpelletti, the IT expert.
But among Vatican watchers the suspicion remains that it was not only the butler who did it; and he himself claimed, in an interview broadcast on Italian television before he was identified and arrested in May, that "around 20" sympathizers within the Vatican helped him steal and leak the documents. The impression that the Holy See wants to draw a line under the whole embarrassing affair as quickly as possible was reinforced when the presiding judge, Giuseppe Dalla Torre, said that the entire case could be wrapped up within a week.