- Amnesty International report brands Libya's militias 'out of control'
- Obama proposes bringing jobs home from overseas. Would his plan work?
- Obama's NASA budget: Mars takes a hit, but space science isn't dead
- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
- Angry Birds joins Facebook in bid to reach 800 million users
After Musharraf's exit, joy and challenges
Pakistan's unpopular president resigned Monday, leaving a divided government to pick a successor and face other mounting problems.
(Page 2 of 2)
Nine years in power
Skip to next paragraphWhen Musharraf – a sporty and respected soldier who won gallantry medals during Pakistan's 1965 war against India – ousted then-Prime Minister Sharif in a bloodless coup in 1999, opinion polls showed 70 percent of the public was behind him.
Pakistanis had become disenchanted with the allegedly corrupt civilian rule of Sharif, whom Musharraf put on trial for corruption and sent into exile. It was Sharif who pushed hardest in recent days for Musharraf's exit.
Musharraf became the fourth military ruler of Pakistan, which has been governed by the Army for more than half its 60-year existence.
The US soon conscripted this religious moderate as a key ally in its fight against terrorism. His government was the biggest recipient of US aid in Asia after Afghanistan.
He also did much to build bridges between India and Pakistan, initiating a cease-fire across the border in 2003 and pushing for peace talks, especially over the disputed region of Kashmir.
But the tide began to turn against Musharraf last year. A violent Army siege against the radical Red Mosque in Islamabad, in which 105 people were killed triggered a surge in Islamic militancy in Pakistan. Today, many Pakistanis attribute the country's militancy problem to Musharraf's close alliance with the US.
Last November, Musharraf ousted dozens of judges and imposed a state of emergency when the Supreme Court met to rule on the legality of his reelection as president while still Army chief.
When the PPP, PML-N, and other parties won parliamentary elections in February, speculation arose as to whether Musharraf would eventually be forced out.
A fractured government moves on
Having effected Musharraf's departure, Pakistan's government faces a slew of difficult tasks. The economy is growing at its slowest rate since 2003 and the government's peace treaties with militants in the northwest have crumbled into frequent, deadly clashes.
The government must also decide whether to reinstate the more than 60 judges whom Musharraf suspended – a move Mr. Zardari has wavered on, but which Sharif supports.
"His going will allow the transition to democracy," says Ahsan Iqbal, education minister and a senior spokesman of Sharif's PML-N Party. "It will bring internal harmony and restore stability to the country."
There are concerns, however, that the government is not up to the task, having proved itself inefficient and fractured during its few months of rule. When Sharif and Zardari announced they were seeking to impeach Musharraf, it was a rare moment of unity between the former bitter allies.
Though the PPP is currently Pakistan's biggest party, many here expect Sharif's PML-N to take that spot because of the support it will probably receive from members of Musharraf's PML-Q Party. Musharraf formed the PML-Q out of the PML-N when he ousted Sharif in 1999.
The government will now be tested by the election of a new president, a process that must be undertaken by an electoral college taken from the lower and upper houses within a month.
There have been reports Zardari will push for a president from the PPP; Sharif is known to oppose this idea.
But first, the government plans to strip the president's powers by altering the Constitution. This will require two-thirds support in both houses of parliament, raising the prospect of another long squabble over how to reform the presidency – and who then should take the job.


Previous






Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube