North Korea and US talk for first time since Kim Jong-il's death

Talks today between North Korea and the US could provide insight to whether North Korea's new government is ready for change.

|
Kyodo/REUTERS
North Korea's First Vice Foreign Minister and envoy to the six-party talks Kim Kye-gwan (2nd L) enters a hotel after a meeting with U.S. Special Representative for North Korea Glyn Davies in Beijing in this photo taken by Kyodo on February 23.

The US and North Korea entered a new round of exploratory talks Thursday in Beijing amid flickering hopes that they would lead at long last to six-party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program.

As Glyn Davies, the new US envoy to North Korea, sat down with his highly experienced counterpart, Kim Kye-gwan, a basic question was how or whether North Korean policy has changed since the death in December of North Korea’s longtime leader, Kim Jong-il.

Mr. Davies entered the talks saying it was a “positive sign” and “a good thing” that North Korea wanted the talks so soon after the transition from Kim Jong-il to his son, Kim Jong-un.

Analysts see the meetings as a tug-of-war. North Korea wants to get the dialogue moving again in order to secure the food that it desperately needs as its stocks run low during the long, harsh winter months. The US has the opportunity to push North Korea toward giving up its nuclear program by holding out on food aid until it sees progress.

“Kim Kye-gwan is eager to make a breakthrough,” says Choi Jin-wook, North Korea expert at the Korea Institute of National Unification. “He initiated the talks.”

Mr. Choi doubts the US is going to consider North Korea’s anxiety about food unless,or until, North Korea makes a significant concession on its nuclear program. After Kim Jong-il’s death, North Korea's state media hailed the program as Kim Jong-il’s “greatest legacy” and the government has shown no signs of willingness to abandon it.

“The positions of the US and North Korea are quite different,” Choi says, though “six-party talks are still possible.”

The US is believed to be demanding that North Korea at least suspend work on a program for producing the highly enriched uranium needed for nuclear warheads. US nuclear physicist Siegfried Hecker, former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, expressed surprise at how far the North Koreans had gone in their ability to enrich uranium for warheads after seeing the facility at the North Korean nuclear complex in Yongbyon in 2010.

According to most intelligence estimates, North Korea has produced material for a dozen nuclear devices with its aging five-megawatt plutonium reactor at Yongbyon. North Korea conducted underground nuclear tests in 2006 and 2009.

L. Gordon Flake, executive director of the Mansfield Foundation in Washington, sees the North Korean request for talks with the US as driven by the need for food.

“The message is North Korea is desperate for food,” says Mr. Flake, a longtime analyst of Korean issues. From the US perspective, he says, the talks in Beijing are “all about whether [North Korea is] serious” about willingness to negotiate on its nuclear program. Six-party talks, hosted by China and last held in Beijing in December 2008, included envoys from Russia and Japan as well as the US and the two Koreas.

The exploratory talks Thursday picked up where negotiators left off in Geneva in October. Davies and Kim Kye-gwan were set to meet in Beijing in the third week in December but cancelled after Kim Jong-il’s death.

“What precisely” were the policies of Kim Jong-un or “in what direction he wants to take his country,” Davies said, “are unknown.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to North Korea and US talk for first time since Kim Jong-il's death
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0223/North-Korea-and-US-talk-for-first-time-since-Kim-Jong-il-s-death
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe