Japan sinks (even) lower on gender discrimination report
The gender gap yawns wide, despite Japan's female astronaut and new antidiscrimination laws. The World Economic Forum recently downgraded Japan three spots to 101st place on its latest gender discrimination report.
Chie, a former saleswoman at a Japanese firm, remembers paying her dues at the office. She put up with men who slapped women’s backsides. She donned a uniform and showed up the required 15 minutes early to brew coffee. Finally, after five years, she told her boss she wanted to take over from two departing salesmen.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
“At the next meeting, he said he was hiring two guys for the jobs,” recalls Chie, who did not want to use her full name. “I quit. And then my boss asked me, ‘Oh, were you serious?’
“I was the first and last person to take maternity leave at that company,” she adds.
Japanese companies have long had a reputation of being unfriendly to women, especially mothers. That image was reinforced recently by the World Economic Forum, which downgraded Japan in its Gender Gap Report from 98th of 130 countries in 2008 to 101st out of 134 countries in 2009.
But on April 19, government and industry representatives set a target of getting 55 percent of women to return to work after having children. Also in April, Japan celebrated Exhibit A for that goal: “mama astronaut” Naoko Yamazaki, who was part of a recent space shuttle crew. And Japan’s low birthrate, and the falling ratio of workers to the aging, are prompting more companies to try to appeal to women.
“Since the population started falling, and then the financial crisis, companies are more conscious of hanging onto their best workers, including the most talented women,” says Miko Fukushima, a mother of two who returned to work at a multinational finance-related firm.
“At some of the biggest Japanese companies, benefits for women, such as maternity leave and creche facilities, are better than at many foreign firms,” she says. “Most of the smaller firms, even some bigger ones, have a long way to go, though.”
Government figures show the situation has actually deteriorated since the first legislation on workplace discrimination in 1985. Some firms categorized employees as “career” or “administration,” with women invariably herded into the latter category. These “office ladies” typically did routine clerical work and served tea.