Immigration reform: Will the US go any further?
Changing illegal immigration is like trying to apply car brakes on a boat: It only drifts, trapped in the same current, writes a guest blogger.
• A version of this post ran on the Foreign Policy Association blog. The views expressed are the author's own.Skip to next paragraph
Social programs tied to Rio de Janeiro Olympics stall
Honduras election: How votes are counted ... counts
Mexico vs. New Zealand World Cup qualifier: Little to cheer for?
Dipping 'pura vida'? Costa Ricans show lack of enthusiasm in run-up to February elections
President Maduro says he'll fight Venezuela's 'economic war' – but can he win?
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
After years of writing on the FPA immigration blog on topics usually concerned with Latino immigration in the United States, I sincerely believe that there are no current policies or legal frameworks that can handle the issue of illegal immigration in the US. With no real spokesperson for the millions of illegal immigrants in the US, specifically one that is actually a part of that group themselves, the needs of that group of people and fairness in handling the issue will never clearly come forward. Speaking on behalf of a community is not the same as truly coming from it and representing those people, leaving the discussions to take place outside of that community and never come to a realistic solution. A re-think of policy development and a non-partisan legal approach is needed, and that will not occur in the current political system. Until then, stopping illegal immigration is like trying to apply car brakes on a boat, it will not stop and your only choice is to choose to drift in a new direction, trapped in the same current.
In the past I have given legal advice to many illegal immigrants in my own country, and have personally seen issues that have never been addressed in immigration policies like those being discussed by Obama and Romney over the last few days. This past week, President Obama introduced a policy to allow children of illegal immigrants who live and have grown up in the US to be able to work and study in the only country they have ever really known. It is surprising that there was any real opposition to this move by Romney a few months ago as prohibiting their status allows for the creation of a population without a true identity. This was an issue with children in Europe who’s parents came from Turkey and had their children while working in Switzerland, but were not able to secure their children’s nationality in the only country they have ever known. They were not Swiss, but not Turkish either, and legally for an individual to have an identity under international law, they have to be a citizen of a state. A fine example of this confronted me one day when I had a client who was reported by his ex-girlfriend who wished to make a silly point to him and had him arrested for his immigration status. When I tried to speak to him in Spanish, he stopped me and answered me in English with the same accent I had, specifically from my city, and told me that his parents were refugees from Chile back in the 1970s and they did not know how to apply for their status and stayed ever since then. He never knew Chile, his Spanish was not likely good enough to work there, and he had a decent education and worked his whole life in my same country, but in the end he was deported. This case stood out for us as we never had someone who was almost exactly like us get kicked out of the country, but the laws were not evolved enough to understand that placing people who are truly part of your society and community into a position with no identity and no power has nothing but negative effects on the entire community.