Florida bill targets firms doing business with Cuba
Florida passed a law banning state public contracts for companies doing business with Cuba – something that violates federal law, writes guest blogger Anya Landau French.
• A version of this post ran on the author's blog, thehavananote.com. The views expressed are the author's own.Skip to next paragraph
El Salvador runoff election: Why an FMLN win wouldn't mean bigger shift to the left
Venezuela's 'color revolution?' The complexity of wearing red. (+video)
Reporter's notebook: How has Mexico City changed?
In their own words: US, Venezuela spar in public
Who is leading Venezuela's protests? (+video)
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Only in Florida can you have legislators so obsessed with another country that they routinely pass laws designed to punish said country even when they harm that state's own interests.
On Friday (March 9), the Florida legislature passed a law that would ban any of the state's public contracts to be awarded to companies that also do business with Cuba. The obvious target of the bill is Brazil's Odebrecht, which has done quite well in Miami over the past couple of decades, and which is also behind the transformation of Cuba's port at Mariel into a major Caribbean shipping hub (no doubt in preparation for the day when US-bound liners are again allowed to stop freely in Cuba). I'm not in a position to wade into whether Odebrecht should or shouldn't win public contracts, except to say it seems to me they should win or lose on the merits, not the politics.
The National Foreign Trade Council's Dan O'Flaherty says the just-passed Florida law is unconstitutional – the constitution prohibits states legislating foreign policy matters in conflict with federal laws. O'Flaherty cites a Massachusetts law that would have enforced a similar restriction on companies dealing with Myanmar (Burma). That law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in 2000.
Perhaps the Florida legislature might be forgiven for its short memory on the subject. Except that not quite three years ago, a 2008 law it passed to force US charter companies to pay exceedingly high bonds to operate their flights to Cuba (which, had it taken effect, would have likely forced them out of business altogether) was struck down by a Federal District Judge in Miami.
“The State of Florida is not entitled to adopt a foreign policy under our Constitution or interfere with the exclusive prerogative of the United States to establish a carefully balanced approach to relations with foreign countries, including Cuba,” the judge ruled.
The 2008 law never took effect. I imagine that Florida taxpayers were thrilled to know their tax dollars were nonetheless spent to defend a state law that was designed to put Florida businesses out of business and destined to be struck down by well-established judicial – Supreme Court, no less – precedent.
IN PICTURES: Cuba Economy
If Florida taxpayers ever figure out this vicious cycle of a boondoggle, they ought to be pretty steamed about it. Defenders of the law claim this bill is needed to keep taxpayer dollars from going to companies that do business with the likes of Cuba. Maybe there also needs to be a bill that keeps taxpayer dollars from being used repeatedly to defend the state legislature's forays into what the constitution considers to be federal foreign policy.
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of Latin America bloggers. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.