Ecuador biggest beneficiary of US-Colombia free trade pact?
After years of delay and controversy, the US Congress approved free trade agreements Wednesday with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea.
A worker trims roses stems at the Floreloy facility in Cayambe, Ecuador. With no trade agreement on the agenda and with bilateral relations not doing so great, Ecuador was not going to have an easy time getting its trade preferences passed through the US Congress. By piggybacking on the Colombian bill, Ecuador receives two years of trade preferences without the controversy of going through the renewal vote on their own.
Alfredo Sosa/Staff/File
Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa is celebrating the passage of the Colombian free trade agreement by the US Congress.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
12.30.11
In surprise landslide, Jamaican opposition wins back power -
12.30.11
Parading back to Rio de Janeiro: the bookish and brainy -
12.29.11
After dramatic 2011 in Cuba, will US-Cuban policy shift in 2012? -
12.28.11
Boom goes the churro: Chilean court upholds damages for exploding sweets -
12.28.11
Why did Hugo Chavez spam Venezuelans on Christmas?
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Within the bill passing Colombia's agreement was an extension of the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act (ATPA or ATPDEA). The ATPDEA was extended through July 2013 and applied retroactively back to February of this year, when it expired. The retroactive effects and current implementation are designed to make sure Colombian exporters continue to receive preference, as they have for the past two decades, while the bill is implemented.
The biggest beneficiary may be Ecuador. With no trade agreement on the agenda and with bilateral relations not doing so great, Ecuador was not going to have an easy time getting its trade preferences passed through the US Congress. By piggybacking on the Colombian bill, Ecuador receives two years of trade preferences without the controversy of going through the renewal vote on their own. Whether they can get an additional renewal in 2013 is going to depend on a number of political factors within both the US and Ecuador, but for now, it's good to have their status set as the status quo.
Hypothetically, Bolivia could benefit as well. However, President George W. Bush suspended Bolivia's participation in the ATPDEA benefits in 2008 and President Barack Obama has maintained that suspension with Bolivia refusing to cooperate with US counter-drug efforts, which are a congressional requirement of this bill.
--- James Bosworth is a freelance writer and consultant who runs Bloggings by Boz.
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of Latin America bloggers. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.





These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.