Subscribe

Who's paying for the 2016 presidential campaign? So far, America’s 1 percenters

The presidential race is being funded by its smallest-ever pool of wealthy donors – most of them clustered by the GOP.

  • close
    Ready for Hillary apparel and accessories being packed up at the Ready for Hillary super PAC store in Arlington, Va. in April. Democrats running for president's super PAC filings account for less than 9 percent of the total super PAC haul so far, according to an Associated Press analysis that compared money raised by formal presidential campaigns with what the super PACs say they plan to report having raised on Friday.
    Andrew Harnik/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

The race for 2016 is being funded, so far, by its smallest-ever concentration of donors, with less than 400 families responsible for raising half the money so far, reported The New York Times on Saturday.

Of the $388 million raised for presidential campaigns, the majority is being streamed to super PACs – external groups that, for five years now, have not been limited in the amount of contributions they can accept from individual donors. Nearly all of the candidates have been encouraging their donors to give to these committees, according to The Associated Press.

Donations to individual candidates cannot exceed $2,700 but super PACs can receive unlimited amounts. 

Recommended: The ‘billionaire primary’: Who’s backing whom?

The numbers were revealed as many super PACs were required to file their first federal fund-raising reports by midnight Friday.

The New York Times, which said it examined Federal Election Commission reports and Internal Revenue Service records, reported:

Analysis … shows that the fund-raising arms race has made most of the presidential hopefuls deeply dependent on a small pool of the richest Americans. The concentration of donors is greatest on the Republican side, according to the Times analysis, where consultants and lawyers have pushed more aggressively to exploit the looser fund-raising rules that have fueled the rise of super PACs.

Just 130 or so families and their businesses provided more than half the money raised through June by Republican candidates and their super PACs.

Democrats account for less than 9 percent of the total super PAC haul so far, according to the AP. Priorities USA Action, the biggest group behind former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, has raised $15.6 million in total, lifted by a $2 million donation from entertainment executive Haim Saban and $1 million from hedge fund investor George Soros. 

In contrast, the single largest contribution to any of the candidate-specific super PACs has been $10 million from Texas energy investor Toby Neugebauer to the organization backing Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, reported the AP. His formal campaign took three months to raise as much money.

Two other prominent donors are almost singlehandedly propping up super PACs for former governor of Texas, Rick Perry. The groups, named Opportunity and Freedom and Opportunity and Freedom I, have raised a total of $12.8 million, $11 million of which have come from Dallas billionaires Darwin Deason and Kelcy L. Warren, according to Politico.

Also from Dallas is Chart Westcott, an investor who told the Times he contributed $200,000 to Unintimidated PAC, a group supporting Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign.

Mr. Westcott said his decision was motivated by “a love of economic freedom. That’s the biggest drive for most donors – more prosperity for the country as a whole, as well as for themselves.”

Since a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2010 held that the restriction of independent political expenditures by nonprofit organizations was constitutionally prohibited, the number of super PACs has ballooned. “The heart of Citizens United is the notion that super PACs, and other outside groups, are completely independent of candidates,” reported NPR’s Peter Overby. “That underpins the Court's conclusion that unregulated money from big donors wouldn't be corrupting to lawmakers.”

But these super PACs are anything but independent, instead “acting as shadow campaigns” for presidential candidates, writes the Times. According to the report, so far some of the money has been going to “chartered planes, luxury hotel suites, opposition research, high-priced lawyers and more.”

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK