Why 3D movies are falling flat this summer
'Avatar' may have paved the way for the next round of 3D movies, but few 3D films are finding success. Clumsy glasses, high prices, and soaring expectations are to blame, say industry experts.
A man watches a 3D movie at the Panasonic booth during the 2010 International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January. Hollywood insiders say that they are noticing the beginnings of a backlash against 3D.
Steve Marcus/Reuters
Los Angeles
The 3D backlash has begun.
Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Everyone from panels of top filmmakers at Comic-Con to the young moviegoers Hollywood most desires is giving the technology the thumbs-down.
The summer’s top live-action hit, “Inception,” is the work of a filmmaker who politely, but firmly, declines to shoot in 3D. So, say box office analysts, marketing pros, technology insiders and a range of moviegoers, for the moment at least, the bloom is off the 3D rose.
“It’s becoming downright cool not to like 3D,” says hollywood.com box office analyst Paul Dergarabedian. “We all knew this was coming because with all that hype, if something seems to be too good to be true, it usually is.” The pullback is evident on both the creative and the moviegoing front, he adds. “ I saw the Jon Favreau clip all over the Internet,” he says referring to the director’s comment that fans should go see his film, “Cowboys & Aliens” twice in regular 2D. “There are a number of big filmmakers who just don’t want to use it,” he points out, adding that moviegoers are watching their bottom line.
“Now that the ticket prices have broken $20, a lot of moviegoers just don’t see the value of paying that much.”
The antipathy goes beyond mere money for some. Duke University junior Zach Davis says he's "very anti-3D.” The son of an actor and a casting agent, he says 3D “distracts from the narrative and makes it hard to follow the story." Most of his friends feel the same way, he says, noting that the clumsy glasses interfere with the social side of moviegoing. “The goggles cut off your peripheral vision and you can’t bond with anyone you’ve come to the theater with.”
Avid videogamer Jeff Torres, arguably as comfortable with cutting-edge gear as any audience member, he says he's "not a big fan of 3D” films. The 25-year-old- actor calls it a “marketing gimmick to get people to pay more for a movie.”
He says he went to “Avatar,” the James Cameron blockbuster which for many, ushered in the current enthusiasm for the technology. “I got tired of wearing the glasses for more than two hours and I didn’t really think it added that much to the story.” Mr. Torres says he would have preferred the “Avatar” adventure as a videogame because then he would have been in control of exploring the environment, rather than being forced to wear the glasses in a passive mode for the length of the film. “I really hope that more filmmakers don’t start using 3D,” he adds.
