Hospital visitation, latest step in delicate dance on gay rights
Gay rights activists cheered Obama's memo on hospital visitation rights, but the president faces increasing tension with constituencies who helped elect him and expected faster results.
(Page 2 of 2)
Obama seems aware of the juggling act he faces, and of the frustrations it creates. Last June, at an event in the East Room of the White House honoring the gay rights movement, the president acknowledged that “many in this room don’t believe that progress has come fast enough,” drawing parallels with civil rights leaders petitioning for equality a half century ago. But, he added, “I suspect that by the time this administration is over, I think you guys will have pretty good feelings about the Obama administration."Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Since that statement, the administration has taken steps toward repealing the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and signed a law that makes it a federal crime to assault an individual because of sexual orientation or gender identity. The administration has also been working quietly with gay rights leaders on areas of common concern, as it did on the hospital visitation memorandum.
“Obama is a proven ally, with a record going back to his days in the Illinois state Senate,” says Rick Rosendall, vice president for political affairs at the Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington. “He is not a perfect ally. We don’t agree on the marriage issue, but he has helped us move forward.”
One striking feature of the visitation memo is its emotional language in expressing sympathy for the gay and lesbian couples that have been barred from hospital bedsides because they are not related by blood or marriage.
“There are few moments in our lives that call for greater compassion and companionship than when a loved one is admitted to the hospital,” the directive begins. “In these hours of need and moments of pain and anxiety, all of us would hope to have a hand to hold, a shoulder on which to lean – a loved one to be there for us, as we would be there for them.”
Some conservative leaders expressed chagrin that Obama was “pandering” to an interest group and that his directive undermined the definition of marriage.
But the Catholic Health Association (CHA), which represents the nation’s extensive network of Catholic hospitals, agreed with the goal of Obama’s memorandum.
“All persons of goodwill can understand and agree that when a person is sick, they deserve to decide who they want to visit them,” CHA president and chief executive officer Carol Keehan said in a statement Friday.