How Martha Coakley misread the tea leaves in Boston Harbor
Win or lose, Martha Coakley’s Massachusetts senate race campaign will influence Democratic strategy in a tough election year. And the result could have major impact on Obama’s agenda.
(Page 2 of 2)
Now with Messrs. Clinton and Obama stumping this weekend, Coakley’s strategic mistakes are turning into a possible lose-lose for Democrats all around. Obama’s stakes alone are huge as, if Coakley pulls out a victory, it would show she couldn’t do it on her own; if she loses, Obama stuck his neck out, got involved (which he initially wasn’t going to do), and showed he couldn’t rescue the one vote he needs to pass healthcare reform in what has, by all accounts, become a referendum on reform.Skip to next paragraph
As Iowa's Kent Sorenson jumps to Ron Paul ship, rat analogies abound
Could Romney 'train' be derailed by Gingrich? Perry? Someone new?
Virginia primary: Was it so hard for Perry and Gingrich to get on the ballot?
Donald Trump as third-party candidate: Will he woo Americans Elect?
Ron Paul: why racist newsletter flap could hurt him in Iowa
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The linchpin here is the healthcare reform bill. With a minority of Americans supporting it, Brown has cast himself as the deal-breaker, the man who could – as the 41st Republican in the Senate – put the kibosh on the bill.
Meanwhile, Coakley’s campaign has been trying to paint Brown as a mediocre populist consorting with known enemies of the President, including the tea party groups
“If Brown wants to make it national, he has to live with Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly,’’ one Coakley adviser told the Boston Globe. ‘‘If that means we have to own Barack Obama and Ted Kennedy, I like our odds.’’
Brown stayed away from fire-breathing conservatives
That charge has actually stuck. Indeed, Brown did not call on figures like John McCain or Sarah Palin to stump for him, but instead called in the more centrist former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani. Brown has, in fact, downplayed his connections to the tea party movement, even as tea partiers contributed to a million-dollar “money bomb” that fell into Brown’s coffers one day last week.
Mr. Clinton denounced the tea party connection to Brown on Friday at a rally for Coakley.
“I thought Massachusetts knew more about American history than anybody else, and understood the Boston Tea Party was a revolt against abuse of power, not against government itself,” Clinton said.
But it is in many ways Obama’s bold agenda and promise to co-opt “business as usual” in Washington that’s sparked a massive second-guessing of progressivism even in the liberal heartland of the Northeastern Commonwealth.
“Voters are down on Washington,” writes veteran AP reporter Liz Sidoti. “They are deeply divided over the healthcare plan in Congress. And a majority think the country is on the wrong track. Nearly all remain anxious about the prolonged recession even though there are signs of recovery. And only about half approve of Obama’s job performance. Excessive spending and big government irk them. And they have lost faith in institutions.”
All a bit overwrought? Maybe not. Tuesday will indicate the depth of voter dissatisfaction, and will show both parties how to win – and how to lose – in 2010.
Follow us on Twitter.