Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

President Obama's economic speech at Georgetown

(Page 4 of 8)



Now, what we’ve also learned during this crisis is that our banks aren’t the only institutions affected by these toxic assets that are clogging the financial system.  A.I.G., for example, is not a bank.  And yet because it chose to insure trillions of dollars worth of risky assets, its failure could threaten the entire financial system and freeze lending even further.  This is why, as frustrating as it is – and I promise you, nobody is more frustrated than me – we’ve had to provide support for A.I.G.  It’s also why we need new legal authority so that we have the power to intervene in such financial institutions, just like a bankruptcy court does with businesses that hit hard times, so that we can restructure these businesses in an orderly way that does not induce panic – and can restructure inappropriate bonus contracts without creating a perception that government can just change compensation rules on a whim.

Skip to next paragraph

Recent posts

This is also why we’re moving aggressively to unfreeze markets and jumpstart lending outside the banking system, where more than half of all lending in America actually takes place.  To do this, we’ve started a program that will increase guarantees for small business loans and unlock the market for auto loans and student loans.  And to stabilize the housing market, we’ve launched a plan that will save up to four million responsible homeowners from foreclosure and help many millions more re-finance.

In a few weeks, we will also reassess the state of Chrysler and General Motors, two companies with an important place in our history and a large footprint in our economy – but two companies that have also fallen on hard times.

Late last year, the companies were given transitional loans by the previous administration to tide them over as they worked to develop viable business plans.  But the plans they developed fell short, and so we have given them some additional time to work these complex issues through.  We owed that, not to the executives whose bad bets contributed to the weakening of their companies, but to the hundreds of thousands of workers whose livelihoods hang in the balance.

It is our fervent hope that in the coming weeks, Chrysler will find a viable business partner and that GM will develop a business plan that will put it on a path to profitability without endless support from the American taxpayer.  In the meantime, we are taking steps to spur demand for American cars and provide relief to autoworkers and their communities.  And we will continue to reaffirm this nation’s commitment to a 21st century American auto industry that creates new jobs and builds the fuel-efficient cars and trucks that will carry us toward a clean energy future.

Finally, to coordinate a global response to this global recession, I went to the meeting of the G20 nations in London the other week.  Each nation has undertaken significant stimulus to spur demand.  All agreed to pursue tougher regulatory reforms.  We also agreed to triple the lending capacity of the International Monetary Fund, an international financial institution supported by all the major economies, and provide direct assistance to developing nations and vulnerable populations – because America’s success depends on whether other nations have the ability to buy what we sell.  We pledged to avoid the trade barriers and protectionism that hurts us all in the end.  And we decided to meet again in the fall to gauge our progress and take additional steps if necessary.

Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story