Biden's speech to AFL-CIO – who banned the cameras anyway?
Say what you will about Joe Biden, but one thing's for sure. He's transparent.Skip to next paragraph
As Iowa's Kent Sorenson jumps to Ron Paul ship, rat analogies abound
Could Romney 'train' be derailed by Gingrich? Perry? Someone new?
Virginia primary: Was it so hard for Perry and Gingrich to get on the ballot?
Donald Trump as third-party candidate: Will he woo Americans Elect?
Ron Paul: why racist newsletter flap could hurt him in Iowa
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Like last week when he was promoting the website he's overseeing. “We’re going to put every bit of this transparently up on a website," he said.
Then he forgot the name of the website. And the website address. Then he asked someone offstage for the website "number."
But who cares about all that. The important thing is that he's transparent.
Transparent or invisible?
Well, except today. Mr. Transparency almost turned into the Invisible Man.
Fox said yesterday the AFL-CIO told them it was the vice president's decision. Today the AFL-CIO told Fox it was actually their decision. They just forgot.
Option #2 sounded better to the vice president's office so they chose that one. It was the AFL-CIO's decision.
And it makes sense. After all, why would the AFL-CIO want the public to see how supportive the vice president is of them?
That would be bragging!
But according to Biden's office, the VP wouldn't stand for the secrecy. He wanted the doors opened. It was just like the Age of Aquarius. Let the sunshine in!
Except no TV cameras. Or a whole bunch of reporters.
Instead a small pool of print reporters could cover it and then a transcript of the speech would be sent out to all the other reporters who were still barred.
This was "part of [Biden's] unprecedented commitment to transparency," the VP's office said.
What'd he talk about?