Subscribe

Speaking Politics phrase of the week: families first

Democrats adopted 'families first' as a counter to the more-Republican 'family values' slogan. In this campaign, it's getting a lot of use. 

  • close
    Former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland, the Democratic candidate for Senate in Ohio, is putting Ohio families first. No word yet on what he's putting second.
    Jay LaPrete/AP
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

“Families first”: A messaging slogan that politicians – often but not exclusively Democrats – use to appeal to couples with children, who are more likely to vote than unmarried people.

“Let’s put families first, and make sure our policies match how you actually work and live in the 21st century,” Hillary Clinton said last week in propounding one of her campaign’s main themes. “Families look a lot different today than they did 30 years ago, and so do our jobs.”

Her remarks came as former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland (D), who is running for the Senate, launched an “Ohio Families First” plan emphasizing access to paid sick days and affordable child care.

Beyond identifying with the concerns of people with kids, “families first” is enduringly popular because it lets voters fill in the blanks for themselves on what should come second – corporations, the wealthy, or some other less-deserving demographic.

It’s a co-option of “family values,” which conservatives started using in the 1980s to defend the interests of traditional families. “Families First” also was the title of a 1992 report from a commission that GOP President George H.W. Bush’s administration appointed to study urban households.

That year, Bill Clinton won the presidency on a theme of “putting people first.” But the party “sharpened it” to its current form when Mr. Clinton sought reelection, wrote Virginia Tech communications professor Robert E. Denton Jr. in his book “The 1996 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective.” (Mrs. Clinton’s use of it thus helps tie her – subtly – to her husband.) 

Almost exactly 20 years ago, the Democratic leaders in the House and Senate at the time, Missouri’s Richard Gephardt and South Dakota’s Tom Daschle, rolled out the “Families First” platform – more tax deductions for educational expenses; expanded child-care tax credits; a law to help job-changers to transfer their pensions; cutting inheritance taxes for family-owned businesses and a loss of tax benefits for companies shifting jobs overseas. House Republicans dismissed it as “tiny ideas from tiny minds.”

It has persisted ever since, becoming more prevalent lately. In the current session of Congress, it has surfaced 39 times in bills or House and Senate floor debates, according to the Congressional Record. If that trend continues, it would represent the most frequent usage since the 2007-08 session.

Despite its association with Democrats, Republicans sometimes invoke it. In Minnesota, GOP lawmakers two years ago unveiled a “Families First” plan that included reducing sales taxes and repealing business-to-business taxes. More recently, House and Senate lawmakers crafted a bipartisan bill – which the House passed this month – to enable states to redirect child foster-care money to services such as parent training. Its title: “The Family First Prevention Services Act.”

The bill “does exactly what the title suggests — it puts families first,” said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R) of Texas. The bill focuses on addressing problems in the home by delivering parents much-needed support, rather than sending a child straight into foster care.”

Chuck McCutcheon writes his “Speaking Politics” blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

Interested in decoding what candidates are saying? Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark’s latest book, “Doubletalk: The Language, Code, and Jargon of a Presidential Election,” is now out.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK