Ted Cruz's 'audition' for 'The Simpsons': Eeexcellent or D'oh?

Buzzfeed got presidential candidate Ted Cruz to 'audition' for 'The Simpsons,' and he nailed it. But was it undignified or smart voter outreach? We think we know the answer.

|
Andrew Harnik/AP
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, greets members of the audience after speaking during the Road to Majority 2015 convention in Washington in June. In a Buzzfeed video posted Tuesday Senator Cruz is shown auditioning to replace 'The Simpsons' cast member Harry Shearer, who has said he’s leaving Fox's animated TV show.

Buzzfeed got presidential candidate Ted Cruz to “audition” for “The Simpsons,” and it’s a performance to behold. It also tells us something about modern American politics, for better or worse.

But before we get to the larger meaning, here’s what happened: In April, Senator Cruz (R) of Texas told The Federalist Radio Hour that he’s a big "Simpsons" fan, but when asked to recite a line from the show, he botched it.

"Simpsons" showrunner Al Jean was reportedly not amused. So when Cruz visited the offices of Buzzfeed recently, he was offered a chance to redeem himself. Cruz has a reputation for being a tad self-important, and here was a way to show his lighter side.

But it wasn’t just a do-over. Buzzfeed had Cruz “audition” for the cast. Harry Shearer, who voices Ned Flanders, Montgomery Burns, and others, is leaving the show, so there’s an opening. And who knows, if this presidential thing doesn’t work out, Cruz might have a future in show biz. His version of Mr. Burns was “eeex-cellent,” his Mr. Flanders downright “okily-dokily,” and his “twirling for freedom,” well, you just have to watch. Cruz even nails the voices of both Lisa and Homer Simpson. 

“I have been told many times I have a face for radio, and I have a face for animation,” the tea-party conservative joked.  

Cruz also managed to work in the fact that he’s running for president.

The liberal-leaning news site Salon accused Cruz of “shamelessly pander[ing] for your votes with an absurd ‘Simpsons’ audition.” We say, guilty as charged. And get used to it. Because more than ever, politicians are jumping into pop culture with both feet.

In February, President Obama did a Buzzfeed video making faces, using a selfie stick, and drawing a doodle of wife Michelle. In January, he sat for an interview with GloZell, the YouTube star known for getting in a tub with Froot Loops and milk. He’s done interviews “between two ferns”  and in a comedian’s garage. And he’s done more late-night appearances than any other president.

Now his wannabe successors are getting in on the action. Last month, right after announcing his presidential campaign, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) appeared on “The Tonight Show” with Jimmy Fallon to “slow jam” the news, a shtick Obama took part in three years ago.

There’s really nothing new here. In September 1968, candidate Richard Nixon went on “Laugh-In” and said into the camera, “Sock it to meee,” the show’s signature line.  

Two months later, Mr. Nixon won the presidency. We’re not suggesting cause and effect, but campaign aides will tell you that a politician showing his or her sense of humor is a plus.  

Still, we do come back to the question we asked back in January, when Obama did the GloZell interview: Are such appearances undignified or smart outreach?

Judging by how often politicians are dipping into pop culture these days, we think we know answer. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Ted Cruz's 'audition' for 'The Simpsons': Eeexcellent or D'oh?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2015/0701/Ted-Cruz-s-audition-for-The-Simpsons-Eeexcellent-or-D-oh
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe