New Hampshire ballot: A lot of candidates – but no Joe Biden

|
Faith Ninivaggi/Reuters
Volunteers urge voters to write in President Joe Biden’s name on the New Hampshire Democratic primary ballot, during an event in Manchester, New Hampshire, Jan. 20, 2024.

Republicans aren’t the only ones voting for a presidential nominee tomorrow in New Hampshire. Democrats, too, will head to the polls – where some may be surprised to discover their ballots don’t feature President Joe Biden’s name.

Because of a disagreement between the Democratic National Committee and Granite State officials over the primary calendar, the Democratic ballot here lists some two dozen candidates – ranging from self-funded Rep. Dean Phillips of Minnesota and author Marianne Williamson to a rapper from Brooklyn and a plumber from Maryland – but not the incumbent president of the United States. Voters wanting to back Mr. Biden on Tuesday will have to write him in.

It all stems from a decision last year by the DNC to put South Carolina first on its schedule of nominating contests – bumping New Hampshire from its century-old kickoff primary to a shared second place with Nevada. South Carolina, the reasoning went, is more racially diverse than New Hampshire and thus more reflective of the party’s voters nationwide. Perhaps not unrelatedly, Mr. Biden also did terribly (fifth place!) in New Hampshire’s 2020 primary, but rebounded in South Carolina and went on to win the nomination. 

Why We Wrote This

Democrats voting for President Biden in New Hampshire will have to write in his name, thanks to the state’s dispute with the national party. Activists here hope to turn lemons into lemonade.

Granite State Democrats reacted to the snub by opting to hold their primary first, anyway. They say they had little choice: New Hampshire’s “first in the nation” status, they note, is mandated by state law.

Mr. Biden still declined to add his name to the ballot and has not campaigned here. Tuesday’s contest will be essentially for show, with no delegates at stake.

Yet Democrats also realized they didn’t want Mr. Biden to suffer an embarrassing “defeat” here. So party activists belatedly wound up organizing a “write-in Biden” campaign, with sign-waving on street corners, TV ads, and flyers flooding Democratic voters’ mailboxes with instructions on how to add the president’s name to their ballots.

Cabinet members and prominent elected officials have flooded New Hampshire in recent days in support of Mr. Biden – from Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to Rep. Ro Khanna of California and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu. 

Some say the situation paradoxically has helped energize Democrats, at a time when polls show Mr. Biden broadly suffering from an enthusiasm deficit. 

“From an organizing standpoint, there’s already more happening for Joe Biden in New Hampshire than the rest of the country,” says Kathy Sullivan, former chair of the New Hampshire Democratic Party and now treasurer of a group organizing the Biden write-in effort.

A poll released Sunday by CNN and the University of New Hampshire showed 63% of the state’s Democrats planned to write in Mr. Biden, with Representative Phillips at 10% and Ms. Williamson at 9%. 

Whether the grassroots effort might persuade the DNC to rethink New Hampshire’s place in future cycles, however, is less clear. Some observers see this year as the end of an era for the state’s “first in the nation” contest, and all its storied traditions. 

“When candidates decide it’s not in their strategic interest to compete here, that’s it,” says Fergus Cullen, a former state GOP chair and author of a history of the New Hampshire primary. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to New Hampshire ballot: A lot of candidates – but no Joe Biden
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2024/0122/New-Hampshire-ballot-A-lot-of-candidates-but-no-Joe-Biden
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe