Trump's reality TV playbook: Seven ways it changed 2016 election

6. Unforeseen plot twists

And Trump’s loss of the important Wisconsin primary to Cruz recently lends a certain irony to Trump’s attempt to control the narrative this campaign, says Thompson at Syracuse University. “It’s as if the techniques Trump brought to the process have turned on him,” he says, noting that a serious setback is also essential for a reality show contender hoping for the brass ring.

“If I were a reality show producer running this show, I would script it exactly like this,” Thompson says. In the latest plot twist, he notes, Trump accuses Cruz of being the leading edge of some kind of invasion of the GOP establishment, even though Trump is the candidate who turned this campaign into a blood sport, spawning a "Never Trump" movement and thus nurturing his own antagonist.

This turn of events also lifts a page straight from the reality show playbook, points out Cesternino. “If you look at ‘Survivor,’ the character that gets rewarded in the end is the one who does what it takes to win,” he says, adding that authenticity without apology or backing down is more important than good behavior. “He may have blood on his hands, but if he really owns his actions, then the jury is more likely to reward him than someone who apologizes for bad behavior.”

For now, it’s unclear if Trump will end up with either the party’s nomination or the White House in his grasp. Indeed, another well-honed convention of the reality genre is to build up one character only to have a last-minute dark horse contestant snatch away the prize.

7 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.