Mitt Romney tries to explain ‘RomneyCare.’ Will it work?
Speaking to Republican activists in New Hampshire, likely presidential candidate Mitt Romney addressed a major challenge: The health care program he took credit for as governor of Massachusetts. Critics say it's a lot like "ObamaCare."
At last, Mitt Romney is tackling head-on his major stumbling block to winning the GOP presidential nomination next year: The health care program he promoted and took credit for when he was governor of Massachusetts – which President Obama has said was the model for the national health care reform law derided by conservatives.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
In the important first presidential primary state of New Hampshire Saturday, he tried mightily.
"Our experiment wasn't perfect – some things worked, some didn't, and some things I'd change," Romney acknowledged in speaking to conservative activists at the Carroll County Lincoln Day Dinner in Bartlett, N.H.
“Our approach was a state plan intended to address problems that were in many ways unique to Massachusetts,” he said. “What we did there as Republicans and Democrats was what the Constitution intended for states to do – we were one of the laboratories of democracy.”
Then he laid into the new federal law.
“One thing I would never do is to usurp the constitutional power of states with a one-size-fits-all federal takeover,” he said. “ObamaCare is bad law constitutionally, bad policy, and it is bad for America’s families…. I would repeal ObamaCare, if I were ever in a position to do so.”
Romney’s speech Saturday was in contrast to his address to the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month. There, he said not a word about the Massachusetts plan, and he barely mentioned the new federal law.
Obviously, pretending it didn’t exist was not going to work, but whether Romney’s explanation now is sufficient remains a big question.
The Associated Press points out that the Massachusetts law signed by Romney in 2006 “has a more sweeping mandate for people to get insurance than exists in Obama's law – and penalizes the uninsured more severely.”