- $1 billion Empire State Building IPO: why it won't be like Facebook IPO
- In surprise move, GOP leaders admit defeat in payroll tax battle
- More than 30,000 Germans turn out against anti-piracy treaty ACTA
- Does Obama blueprint reduce budget deficit fast enough? (+video)
- Pentagon budget: Does it pit active-duty forces against retirees? (+video)
- Murdoch media crisis deepens with five new arrests
- How Pinterest combines the best parts of Facebook, Tumblr, and Etsy
- US, China face 'trust deficit' as China's heir apparent visits
Will Americans raise taxes to curb deficits? Oregon a test case.
A ballot before Oregon voters Tuesday would raise taxes on high earners to lower the yawning state deficit. It is being seen as a snapshot of the national mood.
Election worker Kevin Fitzgerald stands watch as motorists line up to drop off ballots boxes at Multnomah County election headquarters in Portland, Portland, Ore., Tuesday. Oregon voters will determine the fate of tax measures 66 and 67 in today's vote-by-mail special election.
Don Ryan/AP
A vote in Oregon Tuesday will resonate far beyond the Cascade Mountains as a gauge of whether Americans will support tax hikes to keep budget-strapped governments afloat.
Skip to next paragraphThe balloting – on measures to boost personal-income and business taxes – comes as the federal government and many other states are facing pressure to close budget gaps. And the measures, backed by Oregon Democrats, also come just a week after the Democratic Party was shocked by an election loss in the Massachusetts race for US senator.
The outcome in Oregon could tip either way, according to public opinion polls. As a generally Democratic state, and one battered more than most by the recession, it's an important proving ground.
Several states raised taxes last year on high-income earners, as the measure in Oregon would do. But in Oregon, the issue is directly in voters hands, not with the state legislature.
Pro and con
Supporters say a yes vote on Ballot Measures 66 and 67 would make the best of a bad situation. By raising more revenue, the state could close its budget shortfall without cutting into vital services. And they say the levies will fall on a small subset of Oregonians – businesses and people with income above $125,000 – the top 3 percent of Oregonians. Together, the measures would raise $727 million over two fiscal years.
Critics say the state hasn't yet made serious efforts to cut spending, and that the tax hikes on high earners and businesses will kill jobs.
"California has for years dumped its tax burden on those groups, falsely convincing the state's residents that government services are a free lunch because someone else pays for them," John Henchman of the Tax Foundation wrote on the group's website Tuesday. "Entrepreneurs and businesses are already taking notice of Oregon becoming tied with Hawaii for the highest state income tax in the country."
The Tax Foundation, generally a tax-hike foe, says that if Measure 66 passes, Oregonians will face the same top income tax rate as Hawaii (11 percent) as well as local income taxes that Hawaiians don't pay. Businesses, meanwhile, would face a general tax-rate hike, with a new mandatory minimum tax of $150.
Oregon a microcosm
The debate reflects a tough reality that spans much of the US. The economy needs jobs, and rising tax rates do little for job creation. But the recession has dealt a big blow to tax revenues – and many economists say that an economic downturn is not a good time to slash government spending.










Become part of the Monitor community
36K on Facebook | 12K on Twitter | 2,250 on YouTube