Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Obama's budget whacks 121 programs

In a $3.5 trillion spending plan released Thursday, the White House proposes $17 billion in cuts – including some items that President Bush also tried to ax.

(Page 2 of 2)



The White House is proposing to save $10 million by doing away with the Brownfields Economic Development Initiative, a Department of Housing and Urban Development program, because “local governments have access to other public and private funds that can address the same purposes,” according to an OMB analysis.

Skip to next paragraph

It also wants to eliminate the early childhood education program Even Start, because “three national evaluations show the program is not effective,” according to OMB.

If at first you don't succeed....

In general, the Obama administration appears to have gone after what might be called low-hanging fruit, say budget experts.

“In the program terminations there is nothing terribly surprising,” says James Horney, director of federal fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “Their arguments seem to make sense.”

In some cases, they are arguments that have been made before, to no avail.

President Bush tried for years to zero out the JSF alternative engine, for instance, only to see it added back every time by members of Congress eager to protect jobs in their districts.

Obama’s willingness to try again to eliminate the alternative engine is “welcome,” said Tom Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste, in a statement. But “it will be a tough nut to crack,” he said.

Many Republican lawmakers noted that Obama’s list of proposed cuts contained some items targeted in the past by Mr. Bush.

“While we appreciate the newfound attention to saving taxpayer dollars from this administration, we respectfully [suggest] that we should do far more,” said House minority leader John Boehner (R) of Ohio.

New priorities, not less spending

It’s important to note that Obama's cuts, if implemented, would not actually reduce government spending. The cash would be shifted to areas the administration rates as higher priorities.

Nor are extra jet engines and early education efforts the kinds of programs that “got the budget off track,” says Mr. Bixby of the Concord Coalition. “In a certain sense, these types of things are a distraction,” says Bixby, talking of the administration’s promotion of its proposed cuts.

The looming explosion of costs in entitlements, driven by healthcare inflation and the retirement of the baby boomers, is the real problem, he says.

That is something Obama officials say they fully recognize. Budget chief Orszag is an expert in healthcare costs and has long carried out something of a personal crusade to try to get Washington to bring them under control.

Seventeen billion dollars in proposed reductions is “real money,” said Orszag, adding, “This is an important first step but not the end of the process.”