Army war-gamers name top 3 threats facing military in 2025 and beyond

Pentagon war-gamers are looking ahead to how war will evolve. It’s likely to be fought in megacities where resources are being fought over and enemies could be aided by bio and nanotech advances.

|
Osama Al-dulaimi/Reuters
Tribal fighters pose for photographs during a deployment against militants of the Islamic State in Haditha, Iraq, Aug. 25, 2014.

In its “Deep Futures” war game this year at the US Army War College, the Army looked three decades into the future, bringing together top US military officials, counterterrorism experts, and even New York City police to look at the greatest threats that the Pentagon is likely to be facing.

By the best reckoning of Army war-gamers, here are the top three threats facing the US military in 2025 and beyond:

The megacity

By 2030, 60 percent of the world’s population is expected to live in urban areas. “Many megacities feature slums and endemic homelessness, uncontrolled expansion/urban sprawl, and lack of basic support structures,” warns the Army’s “Future Study Plan,” which was produced in conjunction with the war game. 

These are notoriously difficult environments in which to maneuver for US troops. “Military operations in a megacity are complex, dangerous, and intense. Urban terrain is the great equalizer when facing determined combatants,” the war-gamers note. 

This is in large part because “the megacity magnifies the power of the defender and diminishes the attacker’s advantages in firepower and mobility.” 

As a result, the US military “will face the possibilities of larger entrapments,” it adds. “Therefore, the actual city fight remains a close fight – street by street, subsurface to skyscraper level, and often face-to-face.” 

Megacities offer insurgents, criminal networks, and terrorist groups both safe haven and the ability to hide in plain sight.

“It’s not about pouring brigade after brigade into a megacity: They will just swallow it up,” says Col. Kevin Felix, chief of the Future Warfare Division at the Army Capabilities Integration Center. “It’s about thinking of new operational concepts.”

Competition for resources

Exacerbated by the growth of megacities, the competition for resources grows, even as road maintenance and garbage pickup services break down and sewage system backups proliferate. 

For this reason, Army planners predict an “increasingly desperate situation with cholera and disease and so forth,” says Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, director of the Army Capabilities Integration Center.

In the war game, it was a humanitarian disaster that brought the US Army to a fictional megacity in the first place. And it was that humanitarian disaster, too, that “sets the conditions for violence and communal conflict,” Lieutenant General McMaster says.

This in turn “allows illegal armed groups to be able to operate within that chaotic environment and attack each other,” he says.

The rise of these armed groups, with their ambitions of securing power, “will form a world of multiple spheres of influence that are likely to create new security and resource competitions,” the Army war game’s "Strategic Trends Analysis" notes. “Historically, these shifts in power have been extremely violent eras.”

Physical and cognitive 'augmentation'

Given the way in which the Pentagon is investing in technology now, “the Army risks [being overmatched] by 2025” in several key areas, the Army future war-gamers note.

One of these areas, they argue, is biological technology. “Humans could be outfitted with physical and cognitive augmentation,” the "Strategic Trends Analysis" says. “Bio and nanotech revolutions could extend life through nanobot-assisted bodies.”

But how might the Pentagon, with a budget that is many times as large as many other nations combined, risk being surpassed in these areas, as the Army future planners warn?

The answer, McMaster says, is that “we are looking at adversaries who may not use human science in an ethically constrained manner.” This means, he adds, preparing to go up against enemies who are “less constrained by the application of human sciences.” 

In response, “The Army must maximize its number one capital investment – the Soldier – by increasing cognitive and physical abilities to assimilate complex situations.”

This comes back to the importance of the “human dimension,” McMaster says. “How do we prepare to operate – and create adaptive soldiers, who must operate in ambiguity?” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Army war-gamers name top 3 threats facing military in 2025 and beyond
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2014/0829/Army-war-gamers-name-top-3-threats-facing-military-in-2025-and-beyond
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe