Is Iran serious about nuclear talks? West wants guarantees this time.
Iran says it is willing to talk about its nuclear program. But with signs that sanctions are taking a toll on Tehran, the West thinks it has the upper hand – and wants proof that Iran is serious.
Western officials, repeatedly burned by Iran's pattern of accepting talks over its nuclear program only to buy time for further progress in uranium enrichment, are insisting upon guarantees that Iran is serious this time around.Skip to next paragraph
In Pictures Iran's military might
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
That's why Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that Iran's acceptance of the latest invitation for talks – while offering signs of seriousness – will have to be studied further.
Iran has not yet offered any promise to meet the preconditions that the West is demanding before talks begin. While Secretary Clinton did not list those conditions, a senior European official said in January that they include suspension of uranium enrichment and access for international inspectors to verify this.
“There is a potential possibility that Iran may be ready to start talks,” she said. “We’ll continue to discuss and make sure that what we are looking at is substantive.”
Iran's letter of acceptance, sent Wednesday, came in response to a letter of invitation to talks that Lady Ashton sent to Iran in October. In recent weeks, Iranian officials had hinted that Iran would accept a return to talks with a group of world powers. But they said Iran was ready to resume negotiations “without preconditions.”
Clinton on Friday said the US and other powers would require guarantees that Iran is prepared to meet its “international obligations” to limit its nuclear development to civilian purposes.
“We must be assured,” Clinton said, “that if we make a decision to go forward, we see a sustained effort by Iran to come to the table, to work until we have reached an outcome that has Iran coming back into compliance with their international obligations.”