Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Sen. Orrin Hatch survives tea party primary challenge: how he did it

Orrin Hatch, a six-term veteran of the US Senate, fought off a tea party-backed challenge in Utah’s Republican primary Tuesday. His tactics could serve as a lesson for other GOP incumbents.

By Staff writer / June 27, 2012

US Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah greets family members Tuesday outside his campaign headquarters in Salt Lake City. Hatch defeated tea party-backed former state Sen. Dan Liljenquist in the Republican primary election.

Colin E. Braley/AP


Veteran US Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah not only won likely reelection this week, the self-described “tough old bird” survived a tea party assault of the type that’s sent other Republican veterans packing in recent years.

Skip to next paragraph

Unlike long-time Sens. Richard Lugar of Indiana and Bob Bennett, a fellow Utahn, Senator Hatch had the strategy and the resources to defeat his tea party-backed challenger. In this case, that was former state Sen. Dan Liljenquist, who had forced Hatch into a primary runoff election for the first time in the six-term incumbent’s US Senate tenure.

Taking to heart the lessons of former Senator Bennett’s defeat two years ago, Hatch did three things that helped him survive in conservative Utah – lessons that likely will be heeded by others in office labeled “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) by tea partiers looking to challenge voting records and what are seen as the sins of incumbency:

• Hatch polished his conservative credentials, boosting his lifetime American Conservative Union rating of 89 percent to 100 percent in 2010 and 2011, downplaying his reputation for working with Democrats (including the late Sen. Edward Kennedy) while emphasizing what tea party critics called a new-found concern with federal debt and deficits.

• He amassed a huge campaign warchest, spending some $10 million on his reelection bid – 10 times what Mr. Liljenquist was able to collect and spend.

• And he avoided television debates with his much younger Republican opponent, which limited their face-to-face encounters to a single radio debate.

Mr. Liljenquist had the backing of tea party powerhouse FreedomWorks for America, which had spent some $900,000 trying to defeat Hatch, and his reputation for having taken on public employee unions resonated with many conservatives. His main line of attack was that Hatch was guilty of “fiscal child abuse” against future generations by failing as a senior Republican to tackle the national debt.

Hatch denied the charge, and he didn’t hesitate to brand FreedomWorks as out-of-staters and “the sleaziest bunch I’ve ever seen in my life.” Rather than play down his 36 years in Washington, he touted his seniority, including his likely chairmanship of the powerful Finance Committee if Republicans gain control of the Senate.


Read Comments

View reader comments | Comment on this story

  • Weekly review of global news and ideas
  • Balanced, insightful and trustworthy
  • Subscribe in print or digital

Special Offer


Election blogs



More coverage  (View all)

In pictures

Become a fan! Follow us! Google+ YouTube See our feeds!