Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Crist veto a victory for teachers against merit-based pay

But many education reformers see the Crist veto in Florida as just a temporary setback in their quest to improve teaching and teacher compensation.

By Staff writer / April 15, 2010

Florida teachers were up in arms about a bill that would've tied teacher pay to student achievement. The Charlie Crist veto of the bill Thursday was seen as a major victory. Here, Gov. Crist talks with teachers about the bill in Tallahassee on Tuesday.

Steve Cannon/AP


Florida Gov. Charlie Crist (R) on Thursday vetoed a bill that would have radically altered teacher tenure and compensation systems throughout the state.

Skip to next paragraph

Teachers’ unions and school boards mounted a vigorous campaign to stop the bill, alarmed at how it would have removed tenure possibilities for new teachers and based evaluations largely on student academic gains. With the Crist veto, they won the day. But many education reformers see the veto as just a temporary setback in a march toward breaking down the status quo and ultimately improving the teaching profession.

“We’re seeing ... more movement than we have in decades in education reform – particularly around [rewarding] great teachers and leaders,” says Ellen Winn, director of the Education Equality Project, a national coalition that advocates for closing achievement gaps. The Florida bill wasn’t perfect, she says, but it was groundbreaking as a statewide attempt to reward teachers for boosting their students’ skills.

Several school districts around the country have experimented in recent years with tying teacher pay to student academic growth. President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan have also used federal grants to promote the idea – raising concerns that too many good teachers are driven out of the profession because they aren’t rewarded for the great strides their students make. But they’ve been careful to emphasize that performance pay systems are complex, and need to be developed in cooperation with teachers, not imposed on them.

Research shows that “involving key stakeholders in any pay-for-performance effort is vital to future success,” says Susan Freeman Burns, program manager at the National Center on Performance Incentives in Nashville, Tenn.