Rick Perry joins flat tax parade – a hot idea fresh from the 1860s
Rick Perry follows Herman Cain in proposing a flat tax. Ron Paul has endorsed the idea before, too. But the hot new idea among GOP presidential candidates is as old as the Civil War.
“Flat tax.” It's the hottest phrase in Republican politics since “budget cuts.” Presidential candidate Herman Cain includes one as part of his 9-9-9 proposal. Rick Perry put forward his own version Tuesday, which would allow Americans to choose between a 20 percent flat tax and their current income tax rate.Skip to next paragraph
A Christmas tree farmer as president? How he raised spirits during wartime.
Could Iran copy the 'beast'? US aircraft have been reverse-engineered before
Thanksgiving Day proclamation: Its curious link to 'Mary Had a Little Lamb'
Michelle Obama booed. Has that happened to first ladies before?
To define poverty, US has a new (and improved?) formula.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Will also-running Buddy Roemer be next?
But in this case hot does not mean new. The flat tax, as a concept, is as old as American income taxation.
The point of a flat tax is its simplicity and, in the eyes of its proponents, its fairness. In general, it would throw out most of today’s complicated tax code, with its deductions and schedules, in favor of a single rate applied to all income.
The first federal income tax, enacted in 1861 to help pay for the Civil War, was a flat 3 percent levy on earnings over $800. The first peacetime income tax, enacted in 1894, was a flat 2 percent on earnings over $4,000.
After the US Supreme Court struck down the income tax, for reasons we won’t go into here, Congress and the states approved the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which made the thing legal and was the beginning of the tax structure we know and ... well, are acquainted with today.
Today’s income tax is progressive, meaning higher levels of income are taxed at higher rates. The theory behind this is that it distributes the burden of paying for the nation in proportion to the ability to bear that burden.
The modern revolt against this idea has its roots in the early 1960s and the ideas of Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman. To him, progressive taxation was really the redistribution of income by other means. “This seems a clear case of using coercion to take from some in order to give to others,” he wrote in his 1962 book, “Capitalism and Freedom.”
The first politicians who took up Friedman’s ideas and pushed their own versions of the flat tax were conservative libertarians, such as Rep. Phil Crane (R) of Illinois and – you guessed it – Rep. Ron Paul (R) of Texas. But arguably the first big national candidate to adopt the flat mantra was Democrat Jerry Brown, who in his 1992 presidential bid, proposed a flat 13 percent tax on business and personal income.
Since then, editor and businessman Steve Forbes made a national flat tax the centerpiece of his 1996 and 2000 bids for the GOP presidential nomination. Mr. Forbes won little support from Republican voters – but that might have been due to a wooden campaigning style as much as anything else.
Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.