What does it mean to craft a ‘lifestyle of repair’?

|
Clara Germani/The Christian Science Monitor
“You want to be sure there’s accountability, [but] is that a natural thing or is that controlling, white-supremacist patronizing, [even if] the intent is not racist?” – Ross Yednock, with his dogs Mitt (left) and Bella, who rewrote his will to give all his assets to a faith-based reparations organization
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 6 Min. )

Ross Yednock swam in a sea of American middle-class well-being all his life. He grew up in 1980s Midwestern suburbs, enjoyed high school football stardom, graduated from Michigan State University without debt, and had a successful career.

But as the modern American racial reckoning heated up, he began to wonder how different that trajectory might have been if he had not been white.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

For white allies in the reparative justice movement, participation often reflects an evolving view of their civic responsibility.

An intense period of self-reflection and study of history he’d never learned in school followed.

Eventually, having no spouse or descendants, he rewrote his will to give all his assets – cash, home, investments, life insurance – to the Justice League of Greater Lansing Michigan, a faith-based reparations group. Its endowment fund, managed by an all-Black advisory council, will direct money to education scholarships, homeownership programs, and business startups.

This is what is called “practicing a lifestyle of repair,” says Robin Rue Simmons, the former Evanston, Illinois, alderwoman who led the push for the nation’s first municipal reparations program there.

The topic is explosive, however. Eighty percent of white Americans polled by the Pew Research Center in 2021 opposed repayment to descendants of enslaved people.

Yet there is a growing body of reparations plans that could only be happening with white support – and the stories of shifting thought behind it.  

Ross Yednock swam in a sea of American middle-class well-being all his life. He grew up in 1980s Midwestern suburbs, enjoyed high school football stardom, and graduated from Michigan State University without debt. He’s had a career in Michigan Democratic politics and state government while exercising his business chops on the side in profitable real estate investments. 

But as the modern American racial reckoning heated up, the temperature of that sea of privilege grew uncomfortable for Mr. Yednock. He fell into intense self-interrogation about that life, and how much of it he owes to being white.

Speaking about it with furrowed brow, carefully editing his words, he tries to capture the essence of the civic responsibility he feels to repair what he calls a history of “brutality” to Black people that continues to this day.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

For white allies in the reparative justice movement, participation often reflects an evolving view of their civic responsibility.

With the recent crescendo of the reparative justice movement into the mainstream, Mr. Yednock’s is an examination playing out in pockets of white America. It’s seen in California’s consideration of financial payments to the descendants of Black residents discriminated against in the 19th century; in the housing reparations program passed by Evanston, Illinois; in corporate and higher education efforts; and in countless faith-based programs shifting church assets to the Black community. 

“It’s been a slow build, and it’s really kind of rapidly increased in the last five to 10 years,” Mr. Yednock says of his own stir over historical racial injustices from slavery to lynchings, mass incarceration, police brutality, and segregation. 

It culminated in his decision last fall to give voluntary reparations to the Black community. 

Divorced and without dependents, save two ebullient pit bull rescues, he rewrote his will to give all his assets – cash, home, investments, life insurance – to the Justice League of Greater Lansing Michigan. Plus, he gives 1% of his monthly income to that faith-based reparations organization, which has made more than 35 presentations here promoting reparations in the past year and a half. 

This is what is called “practicing a lifestyle of repair,” says Robin Rue Simmons, the former Evanston alderwoman who led the push for the nation’s first municipal reparations program there. The movement must have white allies to succeed, she and other activists say. And that ally group is growing, she adds.

Evolving views

Nonetheless, the topic is explosive.

Baptist minister Michael Woolf, of Lake Street Church of Evanston, rakes his hair anxiously, recalling a few “very nice church ladies” spewing invective at him when his congregation decided last year to offer joint ownership of its building to a Black congregation that felt pushed to break away from the church decades ago.

The Rev. Jason Poling, who oversaw reparations discussions at St. Andrew’s Episcopal Church in Pasadena, Maryland, acknowledges, “There are very good reasons why ... absolutely good-hearted people ... can believe it is not a good idea.”

Mr. Yednock, for example, says that his initial reservations about reparations included such questions as economic feasibility, accountability for funds – and even the validity of the notion that Black Americans monolithically support reparations. 

Indeed, only 30% of Americans polled by the Pew Research Center in 2021 supported repayment of some sort to descendants of enslaved people – with 80% of white Americans and majorities of Hispanic and Asian Americans against the idea. And Pew reported a statistically significant decline in the percentage of white adults who believe that the legacy of slavery affects the position of Black people in America today “a great deal” or “a fair amount” – from 58% in 2019 to 50% in 2021.

And yet, there is a growing body of reparations plans that could only be happening with white support – and the stories of shifting thought behind it.  

Shafkat Anowar/AP/File
Robin Rue Simmons, the former Evanston, Illinois, alderwoman who led passage of the city’s housing reparations program, holds a photograph of her mother, aunt, and grandmother in her Evanston home, April 9, 2021.

A national survey by historian Cane West for the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, D.C., found 48 reparations efforts formed since 2015 in such institutions as churches, corporations, and universities, most of which aimed to provide some type of financial compensation.

The African-American Redress Network documents 463 instances of reparations and redress, 85% of which are not financial repair, but historical analysis, commemoration, or memorialization.

An “aha moment” and self-reflection

Mr. Yednock’s path to voluntary reparation was equal parts history study he didn’t get in school and a searing exploration of what he considers his own unconscious complicity in modern racism.

One powerful example of making historical connections, he notes, is the fact many white people cite as their “aha moment”: that only a small fraction of Black World War II veterans were able to receive the GI Bill education and housing financing that was the foundation of the modern white middle class. 

Mr. Yednock gets choked up recounting some experiences in his personal racial reckoning. Like the head-spinning question a Black acquaintance once posed, “When did you realize you were white?” Or his ill-chosen college karaoke performance of Elvis Presley’s “In the Ghetto” in front of a mostly Black audience that included his biracial girlfriend; or uneasily standing by as his fellow high school football players racially razzed a Black teammate. 

Reparations are “a cycle, not a journey with an end point,” writes the Rev. Peter Jarrett-Schell, author of “Reparations: A Plan for Churches.” He chaired the Reparations Task Force of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, which produced a resolution of apology, repentance, and commitment to reparation this year.

Advocates have various approaches, but all start with education that answers what Mr. Jarrett-Schell calls “the moves people make”: such assertions as “slavery was not that bad, ... it’s the past and doesn’t pertain to us, ... we didn’t participate, ... it’s undoable ... with too many sticky questions involved [such as] to whom is it owed?”

Perhaps nowhere is the gut-wrenching recognition of harms done more transformational for individual white people than in church communities, where it’s not uncommon to uncover forgotten racist histories. One Baltimore-area white Episcopal church had to face the fact that in 1932, it took the proceeds from the eminent domain takeover of its sister Black church nearby and used the funds to pay off its own debt. That left the penniless Black church congregation to scatter with no invitation to join the other.

The humbling recognition of such harms, says Mr. Jarrett-Schell, suggests repayment is “necessary but insufficient.”

The Rev. Grey Maggiano, rector of Memorial Episcopal Church in Baltimore, says he watched individual “changes of heart” in his congregation as it moved last year to devote $50,000, or 10% of its endowment, to reparations. That was a response to the acknowledgment that one of Memorial’s founding directors funded the church while enjoying the profits of work by 400 people he enslaved, including ancestors of a current deacon. 

“I know it’s tough to acknowledge some of this history,” explains Dr. Woolf, in Evanston, “but we can get past the initial sort of anger at being challenged by it; then we have an immense opportunity for white members to have a redemption arc, to be able to talk frankly about race in a way that can be useful.”   

Finding the right fit

One of the biggest hurdles in his own reparation conversion, says Mr. Yednock, is “how you get over the narrative that reparations will negatively impact white people.” Further, the no-strings-attached philosophy that most reparations programs embrace was counter to his basic business intuition.

“You want to be sure there’s accountability,” he says, “[but] is that a natural thing or is that controlling, white-supremacist patronizing, [even if] the intent is not racist? I had to get over the desire for directing the payments.”

Ultimately, the Justice League of Greater Lansing’s reparations structure was a comfortable fit for him, with its endowment fund managed by an all-Black advisory council that will direct money to support education scholarships, homeownership programs, and business startups.

“I have close friends who don’t agree with me on this. They get why I’m doing it, but they say, ‘You’re a white guy with no connection to the Black community.’”

Building a genuine connection between Black and white communities, he and many reparations supporters say, is the insurance against the pay-to-make-this-go-away gesture. 

Mr. Yednock hopes Americans, at heart, are better than that. 

This story was produced as part of a special Monitor series exploring the reparations debate, in the United States and around the world. Explore more.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What does it mean to craft a ‘lifestyle of repair’?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2023/0616/What-does-it-mean-to-craft-a-lifestyle-of-repair
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe