Orrin Hatch's 'no' on Elena Kagan a template for GOP opposition
In a detailed essay, Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch laid out the reasons he will not support Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan. Republicans look set to follow his lead.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
“Elena Kagan’s record shows that her primarily academic and political experience and her activist judicial philosophy make her inappropriate for serving on the Supreme Court,” Senator Hatch wrote.
The long-serving member of the Senate Judiciary Committee made the comments in an essay published on the conservative website National Review Online. The detailed arguments offer an initial blueprint for expected Republican opposition to Ms. Kagan's nomination.
Hatch voted for Kagan in March 2009 when she was up for confirmation as President Obama’s solicitor general. Five months later, he voted against the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.
Hatch’s decision is not expected to hinder Kagan’s expected confirmation in the full Senate, where Democrats hold a 58-to-41 advantage over Republicans – and analysts say a Republican filibuster is out of the question.
Parts of Hatch’s essay mirror comments he made last week. He noted that he came to the decision to oppose Kagan after studying her record, participating in the confirmation hearings, and “listening to the views of folks in Utah and across the country.”
Political analysts say Hatch is under pressure by some in the "tea party" movement, which helped defeat fellow Republican Utah Sen. Robert Bennett.
A law unto herself?
Hatch said he was concerned that Kagan might become a law unto her herself once safely in the lifetime seat on the high court.
He cited her master’s thesis at Oxford University as a source of insight into the kind of judge she might become. She wrote that judges may “mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends.”