Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Focus less on the S.A.T., study tells colleges

Exams tied to school curricula may be a viable alternative for admissions assessment, a year-long study says.

By Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / September 24, 2008

Test prep: For families who can afford the courses, private firms help prepare students for the SAT test.

Julia Malakie/AP/FILE


Colleges need to rethink their heavy reliance on students' SAT and ACT scores in deciding who gets in.

Skip to next paragraph

That's a key conclusion drawn by a group of high school counselors and college officials after a year-long study of admissions testing.

Rather than suggesting a one-size-fits-all approach, the group urges colleges to study how well such tests predict academic success of freshmen on their own campuses – and to consider dropping them if they aren't useful enough.

The 21-member panel, chaired by Harvard's dean of admission, will present its findings Friday at the annual meeting of the group that convened it, the National Association for College Admission Counseling. NACAC members include high school counselors and admissions officers from about 1,700 colleges and universities.

Admissions tests affect not only college applicants, but also everything from merit aid to college rankings. They're a growing source of controversy: Hundreds of colleges have decided to make the tests optional, but overall, the weight they're given has increased. According to NACAC surveys, 59 percent of colleges attributed considerable importance to admissions tests in 2005, compared with 47 percent a decade earlier.

"The admissions profession has been doing some soul-searching about what we're doing to these kids – and the inappropriate overreliance on standardized testing is probably one of the easy ones we could fix," says Barmak Nassirian, associate executive director of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers in Washington, which did not participate in the commission.

In defense of the SAT

Not everyone agrees with the criticisms of standardized testing.

"It is still the single most reliable, comprehensive metric that one can find," says Peter Salins, former provost of the State University of New York system.

Expensive test-prep courses may give affluent students a marginal advantage, Mr. Salins acknowledges. But the unfairness "would be exacerbated in an SAT-less universe, because then the kind of schools they go to [such as wealthy suburban or elite urban schools] would get enormous preference in the admissions process," he says.

In suggesting possible alternatives, the commission says tests tied to high school curriculum, such as the College Board's Advanced Placement exams and Subject Tests, are useful predictors of students' grades during their first year in college. The group urges colleges to consider these tests when possible.