If robots replace half of US workers, what role will humans play?

Nearly half of US jobs – including telemarketing and secretarial work – could be automated within the next 20 years. But even as computers take over certain industries, new industries such as software development and renewable energy are creating jobs.

|
Reuters
Researchers at the University of Oxford estimate than nearly half of jobs in the US are susceptible to computerization within the next 20 years. Here, a pair of robots named Xiaolan (L) and Xiaotao serve food at a restaurant in Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China on May 18, 2015.

Could a computer or a robot do your job? If you work in a field such as telemarketing, office work, or insurance underwriting, chances are good that it could, say researchers at the University of Oxford.

Their report, titled “The Future of Employment,” estimates that 47 percent of jobs in the United States are susceptible to automation within the next 20 years as computers and robots become more sophisticated.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that computerization doesn’t necessarily spell disaster for the US economy, since new jobs will arise as others are ceded to machines. In the early 1900s, about 40 percent of the American workforce worked in agriculture; today only about 2 percent does, yet the unemployment rate has been steady over the long term.

Michael Osborne, a professor of machine learning and one of the report’s authors, says technological developments over the past few years have lent weight to the report’s conclusions. As computers become more adept at performing jobs in certain industries, other new industries – such as software development, big data analysis, and renewable energy – are creating jobs for people, he told the Brisbane Times. Professor Osborne is visiting Brisbane, Australia, this week to discuss his findings on what the future of work might look like.

His 2013 report included several surprising conclusions, such as the prediction that restaurant servers are particularly susceptible to having their jobs replaced by computers and robots. The authors said they found that scenario implausible at first, since making pleasant small talk with customers is at the heart of a restaurant service job, and that’s not something robots are particularly good at. But a number of restaurant chains, including Chili’s and Applebee’s, have begun adding small tablets to their tables that allow customers to place food orders and pay for their meals. Servers still bring food to tables and interact with customers, but some aspects of the job are now automated.

To produce the report, the authors took data on more than 700 occupations from the US Department of Labor and used an algorithm to estimate how susceptible each occupation is to computerization based on variables such as the amount of social intelligence, creativity, and visual perception needed to be successful at that occupation. In addition to restaurant servers, they found that telemarketers, legal secretaries, watch repairers, and – surprisingly – models were at an especially high risk of being replaced by machines. (Presumably this means we’ll see more computer-drawn fashion models in print and video advertising, as opposed to cyborgs strutting the catwalk.)

It’s tough to predict what the labor market will look like in 20 years. Certainly some of the jobs we take for granted today will be automated as robots and computers become more sophisticated, but it’s just as certain that people will be working in new industries that haven’t even been dreamed up yet.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to If robots replace half of US workers, what role will humans play?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0528/If-robots-replace-half-of-US-workers-what-role-will-humans-play
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe