- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- As Sarkozy seeks new term, French are wary of 'Merkozy' (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
NASA moon bombing successful. Did we find water?
NASA successfully bombed the moon on Friday ending the LCROSS mission. Now scientists will begin their search for water.
Artist's impression of LCROSS watching the Centaur upper stage it guided smash into the moon. After the first collision, the instruments on LCROSS will measure the properties of the material the collision kicks up. Then it too smacks into the moon.
Reuters
NASA did it. NASA bombed the moon.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
08.05.11
Lego figures to Jupiter on Juno spacecraft. Why send toys into space? -
01.21.11
Paul the Octopus gets own memorial -
10.26.10
Paul the Octopus has died. Who will predict the next World Cup outcome? -
09.22.10
San Diego whale unearthed at the zoo -
09.14.10
Killer shrimp assault British shrimp, threaten ecosystem
Its LCROSS mission punched two new craters in the moon this morning, and only about a minute behind schedule (see video below).
As for whether LCROSS kicked up evidence for water on the moon (the object of the exercise), the jury is still out.
It will take scientists a couple of weeks to figure out if the shadowed area of Cabeus crater holds any water ice. Visually, not much seemed to happen. Michael Bicay, the science director a NASA's Ames Research Center said: "It's hard to tell what we saw here."
But if the science team does find water? How do you get at it, especially if it's covered with moon dust? Just nuke it in a microwave!
That's an approach Ed Ethridge and his colleagues are experimenting with at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Hunstville, Ala. It's a way of turning radio waves into a wringer.
Using simulated moon dirt, they found that under very cold, moon-like temperatures and in a vacuum, a standard household microwave oven would heat the lunar soil, causing ice that had condensed on the soil's grains to change directly from solid directly to gas. By trapping and cooling the gas, they got liquid water.
The approach clearly isn't ready for prime time, Dr. Ethridge cautioned during a phone chat. But it is a proof of principle, he says.
If it works on real lunar soil, it could eliminate the need to dig up icy soil with heavy machinery and run it through energy-hunger water-removal equipment.
Typically, when you cook with a microwave, he says, the microwaves are heating up the water molecules in the food -- cooking from the inside out. But heating ice itself is a different issue. Take that frozen chicken you defrosted as an example. It took several minutes. That's because the oven is operating at less than full power. But it also takes time because ice doesn't respond to microwaves as readily as liquid water does, Ethridge explains.
In the case of lunar soil, the microwaves heated it just enough, even at liquid-nitrogen temperatures, to warm the ice, which then vaporized.
Dr. Etheridge's team extracted 99 percent of the simulated soil's water content.
With data from the experiment well in hand, Ethridge says his group wants to measure the properties of true lunar soil archived at the Johnson Space Center. Then the team can plug that information into their computer models to gage how lunar soil would respond to microwaves.
Lunar-outpost designs call for recycling virtually everything possible, Ethridge notes. But those designs still envision loses -- to the tune of about a ton of water and a ton of oxygen a year.
If microwaving lunar soil proves practical, it could provide a relatively simple way to replenish those losses. And, he adds, "we wouldn't have to strip-mine the moon to do it."








These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.