- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- As Sarkozy seeks new term, French are wary of 'Merkozy' (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
Astronomers say they've ID'd missing "middleweight" black hole
Artist's impression of an ultra-bright x-ray source that appears to be a missing link in the mass range of black holes. The object appears as a bright, blue-white object just to the left of the galactic bulge and just above the galaxy's disc.
Heidi Sagerud
In a universe filled with black holes small and gargantuan, astronomers have puzzled over why they don't see anything in between -- a kind of middleweight black hole.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
08.05.11
Lego figures to Jupiter on Juno spacecraft. Why send toys into space? -
01.21.11
Paul the Octopus gets own memorial -
10.26.10
Paul the Octopus has died. Who will predict the next World Cup outcome? -
09.22.10
San Diego whale unearthed at the zoo -
09.14.10
Killer shrimp assault British shrimp, threaten ecosystem
After all, if you got really big, say millions to billions of times the mass of the sun, you surely had to go through some sort of growth stages to get there.
Now, a team of European astronomers says it has found the best evidence yet for the existence of these in-between objects. Their candidate for an intermediate-mass black hole tips the scales at more than 500 times the sun's mass. It calls a galaxy 290 million light-years away home.
A formal report of the team's find appears in the latest issue of the journal Nature.
The object, dubbed HLX-1, appears as an extraordinarily bright object at x-ray wavelengths -- some 260 million times brighter than the sun. That's in a range where you'd expect a middleweight black hole to shine, writes Sean Farrel in an email. He's a University of Leicester astronomer who led the effort.
Those x-ray emissions don't really come from the black hole itself, of course. A black hole's gravity is so intense that even if you could travel at the speed of light, you won't escape its grip. Instead, the x-rays are generated by the gas that's being drawn into the black hole. It's like a final shout-out before oblivion.
HLX-1's brightness falls between that of black holes that form from individual stars and the brightness of supermassive black holes found at the centers of galaxies. This trait, combined with the way HLX-1's brightness varies over time, left the team with no other conclusion.
"I think our case is pretty solid," Dr. Farrell says.
Update:
For a bit more on the discovery, you can go here for the backstory on detecting a possible middleweight black hole.
And you can read about future plans for confirming the observation -- and discovering new candidates -- here.








These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.